Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗生物类似药(恩考达)与参照贝伐单抗(阿瓦斯汀)治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项多中心真实世界研究

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar (Encoda) Compared With Reference Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Real-World Study.

作者信息

Shan Han, Wang Mengmeng, Huang Shuohan, Liu Hongyue, Liu Jiyong, Du Qiong

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024 Dec 11;18:11795549241303726. doi: 10.1177/11795549241303726. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda), which was approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in China in 2019, is a biosimilar of bevacizumab. Approval of bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was based on the extrapolation principle of biosimilar. However, there is currently no available data regarding the efficacy and safety of both bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) and bevacizumab in patients with mCRC.

METHODS

The present real-world study included patients with mCRC who received first-line therapy with either bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) or bevacizumab combined with backbone chemotherapy between April 2021 and December 2022. The overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint of the study. Bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) would be considered equivalent to bevacizumab if it met any of the following criteria: the 90% CI for ORR risk ratio of bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda): bevacizumab was included within the predefined equivalence range (0.75 to 1.33) as specified by the NMPA or within the predefined equivalence range (0.73 to 1.36) as specified by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); the 95% CI for the ORR risk difference of 2 groups was included within the predefined equivalence range (-0.12 to 0.15) as specified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

RESULTS

The study included a total of 436 patients, with 234 receiving bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) and 202 receiving bevacizumab. The ORR was 42.3% (95% CI: 35.9% to 48.9%) in the bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) group and 42.1% (95% CI: 35.2% to 49.2%) in the bevacizumab group. The ORR risk ratio and risk difference were 1.005 (90% CI: 0.836 to 1.210) and 0.002 (95% CI: -0.091 to 0.095), respectively, both included within the prespecified equivalence range. The overall safety profile was comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study is the first to demonstrate the efficacy equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar (Encoda) and bevacizumab in first-line treatment of mCRC.

摘要

背景

贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)于2019年在中国获得国家药品监督管理局(NMPA)批准,是贝伐珠单抗的生物类似药。贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)用于转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的批准是基于生物类似药的外推原则。然而,目前尚无关于贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)和贝伐珠单抗在mCRC患者中的疗效和安全性的可用数据。

方法

本项真实世界研究纳入了在2021年4月至2022年12月期间接受贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)或贝伐珠单抗联合一线化疗的mCRC患者。总缓解率(ORR)是该研究的主要终点。如果贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)符合以下任何一项标准,则将被视为与贝伐珠单抗等效:贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)与贝伐珠单抗的ORR风险比的90%CI包含在NMPA规定的预定义等效范围内(0.75至1.33)或美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)规定的预定义等效范围内(0.73至1.36);两组ORR风险差异的95%CI包含在欧洲药品管理局(EMA)规定的预定义等效范围内(-0.12至0.15)。

结果

该研究共纳入436例患者,其中234例接受贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)治疗,202例接受贝伐珠单抗治疗。贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)组的ORR为42.3%(95%CI:35.9%至48.9%),贝伐珠单抗组为42.1%(95%CI:35.2%至49.2%)。ORR风险比和风险差异分别为1.005(90%CI:0.836至1.210)和0.002(95%CI:-0.091至0.095),均包含在预先指定的等效范围内。两组的总体安全性相当。

结论

这项真实世界研究首次证明了贝伐珠单抗生物类似药(恩考达)和贝伐珠单抗在mCRC一线治疗中的疗效等效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb1/11635854/db59fd93cf8b/10.1177_11795549241303726-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验