Suppr超能文献

与两种镍钛单根管锉系统相比,一种不锈钢根管锉系统根管预备能力的临床评价

Clinical Evaluation of Root Canal Shaping Ability of a Stainless-steel File System Compared to Two Nickel-titanium Single-file Systems.

作者信息

Mais Alaa O, Abdallah Amr M, Osman Essam, Alhadainy Hatem A

机构信息

Division of Endodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Beirut Arab University, Lebanon.

Division of Endodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Nov 1;16(11):e1393-e1398. doi: 10.4317/jced.62012. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Root canal shaping is an important phase in endodontic treatment to preserve the integrity of root structures. This clinical study used cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess the shaping ability of Tornado compared to WaveOne (WO), and OneShape (OS) rotary systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MesioBuccal canals of lower molars with curving angles ranging from 15° to 45° were used in 30 patients to evaluate the apical transportation and centering ability of Tornado, WO, and OS. The canals were divided into 3 groups according to the instrumentation system (n=10), which corresponded to the systems that were employed. Centering ratio and canal transportation were assessed at 2, 5, and 8 mm from the apical foramen using CBCT. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test at p-value = 0.05.

RESULTS

All tested levels showed no statistically significant difference in transportation and centering ability (>0.05). The Tornado file preserved the original canal curvature with no statistical significance compared to WO files and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The tornado file system was proven to provide an accepted quality of root canal shaping compared to WO and OS rotary systems. All systems maintained the original canal anatomy with appropriate centralization and no canal transportation. Canal Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, Nickel-Titanium Files, Tornado Rotary System.

摘要

背景

根管预备是牙髓治疗中保留牙根结构完整性的重要阶段。本临床研究使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估Tornado与WaveOne(WO)和OneShape(OS)旋转系统相比的预备能力。

材料与方法

选取30例患者下颌磨牙近中颊根,弯曲角度为15°至45°,以评估Tornado、WO和OS的根尖移位及就位能力。根据预备器械系统将根管分为3组(n = 10),分别对应所使用的系统。使用CBCT在距根尖孔2、5和8 mm处评估就位率和根管移位情况。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析,p值 = 0.05。

结果

所有测试水平在移位和就位能力方面均无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。与WO锉和OS锉相比,Tornado锉保持了原始根管弯曲度,无统计学意义。

结论

与WO和OS旋转系统相比,Tornado锉系统被证明能提供可接受的根管预备质量。所有系统均保持了原始根管解剖结构,就位良好且无根管移位。根管就位能力、根管移位、锥形束计算机断层扫描、镍钛锉、Tornado旋转系统

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1202/11632736/bc44a7701683/jced-16-e1393-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验