Hughto Jaclyn M W, Hughes Landon D, Nelson Kimberly M, Perry Nicholas S, Mimiaga Matthew J, Biello Katie B, Bailey Amelia, Pantalone David W
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; COBRE on Opioids and Overdose, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Feb;169:209602. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209602. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Opioid use disorder is a chronic, relapsing disease and a major source of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) have been shown to reduce opioid use; however, MOUD maintenance is often suboptimal. Depression is a well-documented risk factor for MOUD treatment disengagement; thus, behavioral interventions to address depression and support ongoing MOUD use in community settings are warranted.
We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the CoMBAT (Combined Medication and Behavioral Activation Treatment) intervention via a pilot randomized controlled trial. We hypothesized that the CoMBAT intervention, which uses behavioral activation, motivational interviewing, and problem-solving techniques, would be feasible and acceptable to participants and decrease depression, increase goal-directed activity, improve MOUD care engagement, and reduce opioid use among adults with depressive symptoms who had a missed dose or clinical MOUD visit in the past 30 days. We enrolled 32 participants prescribed methadone or buprenorphine in the community; each received 2 health navigation and substance use counseling sessions (HN_SUC) before being randomized into (a) the 8-session CoMBAT intervention + HN_SUC + treatment as usual or (b) HN_SUC + treatment as usual only. The primary outcomes were intervention feasibility and acceptability. Preliminary efficacy measures included self-reported past-30-day MOUD doses and clinical visits, depressive symptoms, behavioral activation; and opioid-positive urinalysis; each assessed at baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-up visits.
The intervention was feasible (88 % of intervention sessions completed; 100 % retention at 6 months) and acceptable (86 % of intervention participants were satisfied/very satisfied with the intervention at 3-months; and intervention participants had a high level of alliance with their counselor at the mid-point: mean = 5.7 out of 7 [SD = 1.3] and end of their treatment: mean = 5.5 out of 7 [SD = 1.1]. At 6-months, intervention participants reported fewer missed MOUD doses and visits, less depressive symptoms, greater behavioral activation scores, and a lower percentage of opioid-positive toxicology screens relative to the control condition.
Findings provide evidence of intervention feasibility and acceptability and demonstrate initial efficacy for ongoing MOUD care engagement, depressive symptom reduction, increased behavioral activity, and reduced opioid use. Future intervention testing in a fully-powered efficacy trial is warranted.
阿片类物质使用障碍是一种慢性复发性疾病,是美国发病和死亡的主要原因。用于治疗阿片类物质使用障碍的药物(MOUD)已被证明可减少阿片类物质的使用;然而,MOUD维持治疗往往效果欠佳。抑郁症是MOUD治疗中断的一个有充分记录的危险因素;因此,在社区环境中采取行为干预措施来解决抑郁症问题并支持持续使用MOUD是必要的。
我们通过一项试点随机对照试验评估了CoMBAT(联合药物和行为激活治疗)干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。我们假设,采用行为激活、动机性访谈和解决问题技巧的CoMBAT干预措施对参与者来说是可行且可接受的,并且能够减轻抑郁症状、增加目标导向活动、改善MOUD护理参与度,并减少在过去30天内有漏服剂量或未进行临床MOUD访视的有抑郁症状成年人的阿片类物质使用。我们招募了32名在社区中接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的参与者;每人在被随机分为(a)为期8节的CoMBAT干预+健康导航与物质使用咨询课程(HN_SUC)+常规治疗或(b)仅HN_SUC+常规治疗之前,先接受2节健康导航与物质使用咨询课程。主要结局是干预措施的可行性和可接受性。初步疗效指标包括自我报告的过去30天内MOUD剂量和临床访视、抑郁症状、行为激活;以及阿片类物质阳性尿液分析;在基线以及3个月和6个月随访时进行评估。
该干预措施是可行的(88%的干预课程完成;6个月时保留率为100%)且可接受的(86%的干预参与者在3个月时对干预措施感到满意/非常满意;干预参与者在治疗中期与咨询师的联盟程度较高:平均评分为7分中的5.7分[标准差=1.3],在治疗结束时:平均评分为7分中的5.5分[标准差=1.1]。在6个月时,与对照组相比,干预参与者报告的MOUD漏服剂量和访视次数更少、抑郁症状更少、行为激活得分更高,且阿片类物质阳性毒理学筛查的百分比更低。
研究结果提供了干预措施可行性和可接受性的证据,并证明了在持续的MOUD护理参与、减轻抑郁症状、增加行为活动以及减少阿片类物质使用方面的初步疗效。有必要在一项充分有力的疗效试验中对未来的干预措施进行测试。