• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每周一次替尔泊肽与每日一次基础胰岛素治疗口服降糖药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Once-Weekly Tirzepatide Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin in Managing Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Oral anti-Hyperglycemic Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kamrul-Hasan A B M, Selim Shahjada, Afsana Faria, Nagendra Lakshmi, Ahmed Rezwana, Dutta Deep

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Mymensingh Medical College, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Department of Endocrinology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2025 Mar;31(3):315-325. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.005
PMID:39672540
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

No meta-analysis has been published comparing the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide vs once-daily basal insulins in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs. This meta-analysis was conducted to address this knowledge gap.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials involving subjects with T2D inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycemic drugs and receiving tirzepatide in intervention arm and basal insulins in control arm as add-on therapy were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome assessed was the change from baseline in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials involving 4339 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Compared to basal insulins, tirzepatide arms achieved greater reductions from the baseline in HbA1c (tirzepatide 5 mg: mean difference (MD) -0.89% [95% CI: -1.23, -0.54]; tirzepatide 10 mg: MD -1.11% [95% CI: -1.42, -0.79]; and tirzepatide 15 mg: MD -1.23% [95% CI: -1.48, -0.97]; P < .00001 for all). Additionally, the proportions of patients achieving HbA1c levels below 7.0%, 6.5%, and 5.7% were significantly greater in the tirzepatide groups than in the basal insulin group. Greater body weight and blood pressure reductions were observed with tirzepatide than with basal insulins. Moreover, tirzepatide had a more favorable impact on lipid profile. Hypoglycemia was less frequent with tirzepatide. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with tirzepatide (all doses) than basal insulin, although serious AEs were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Tirzepatide outperformed basal insulins in controlling blood glucose, body weight, blood pressure, and lipids in subjects with T2D and is generally well-tolerated except for its higher gastrointestinal AEs.

摘要

目的

尚无荟萃分析比较替尔泊肽与每日一次基础胰岛素在口服降糖药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的疗效和安全性。本荟萃分析旨在填补这一知识空白。

方法

通过电子数据库检索随机对照试验,这些试验纳入口服降糖药物控制不佳的T2D患者,干预组接受替尔泊肽,对照组接受基础胰岛素作为附加治疗。评估的主要结局是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)较基线的变化。

结果

三项涉及4339名受试者的随机对照试验符合纳入标准。与基础胰岛素相比,替尔泊肽组的HbA1c较基线降低幅度更大(替尔泊肽5mg:平均差值(MD)-0.89%[95%CI:-1.23,-0.54];替尔泊肽10mg:MD -1.11%[95%CI:-1.42,-0.79];替尔泊肽15mg:MD -1.23%[95%CI:-1.48,-0.97];所有P<0.00001)。此外,替尔泊肽组达到HbA1c水平低于7.0%、6.5%和5.7%的患者比例显著高于基础胰岛素组。与基础胰岛素相比,替尔泊肽使体重和血压降低幅度更大。此外,替尔泊肽对血脂谱有更有利的影响。替尔泊肽导致低血糖的频率更低。替尔泊肽(所有剂量)引起的胃肠道不良事件(AE)比基础胰岛素更频繁,尽管两组严重AE的发生率相当。

结论

在控制T2D患者的血糖、体重、血压和血脂方面,替尔泊肽优于基础胰岛素,除胃肠道AE较高外,总体耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Once-Weekly Tirzepatide Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin in Managing Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Oral anti-Hyperglycemic Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.每周一次替尔泊肽与每日一次基础胰岛素治疗口服降糖药物控制不佳的2型糖尿病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Endocr Pract. 2025 Mar;31(3):315-325. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.005. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用双重 GIP/GLP-1 受体激动剂替西帕肽治疗 2 型糖尿病:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2022 Aug;65(8):1251-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05715-4. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Optimal Use of Once-Weekly Basal Insulin Efsitora Alfa in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.1型和2型糖尿病中每周一次基础胰岛素艾夫司托拉α的最佳使用:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endocr Pract. 2025 Apr;31(4):471-478. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2024.12.013. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.皮下注射替西帕肽与司美格鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病成人患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2024 Jul;67(7):1206-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06144-1. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
5
Indirect comparative efficacy and safety of tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg versus semaglutide 2.4 mg for the management of obesity and overweight in patients with type 2 diabetes.替尔泊肽10毫克和15毫克与司美格鲁肽2.4毫克治疗2型糖尿病患者肥胖和超重的间接比较疗效与安全性
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16508.
6
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
7
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与基础胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):228-238. doi: 10.1111/dom.12805. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Efficacy and safety of basal insulins in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.基础胰岛素在 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 21;15:1286827. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1286827. eCollection 2024.
9
Insulin and oral agents for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.用于治疗囊性纤维化相关糖尿病的胰岛素和口服药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 18;4:CD004730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004730.pub4.
10
Tirzepatide outcompetes long-acting insulin in managing type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of three phase 3 randomized controlled trials.替尔泊肽在 2 型糖尿病管理中优于长效胰岛素:三项 3 期随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Dec;48(12):1684-1695. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01621-4. Epub 2024 Aug 29.