Suppr超能文献

纳米材料的氧化电位:血清铁还原能力(FRAS)测定的优化高通量方案及实验室间比较

The oxidative potential of nanomaterials: an optimized high-throughput protocol and interlaboratory comparison for the ferric reducing ability of serum (FRAS) assay.

作者信息

Ruijter Nienke, Boyles Matthew, Braakhuis Hedwig, Ayerbe Algaba Rafael, Lofty Morgan, di Battista Veronica, Wohlleben Wendel, Cassee Flemming R, Candalija Ana

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health & the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Nanotoxicology. 2024 Dec;18(8):724-738. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2024.2438116. Epub 2024 Dec 14.

Abstract

Successful implementation of Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) and grouping approaches requires simple, reliable, and cost-effective assays to facilitate hazard screening at early stages of product development. Especially for nanomaterials (NMs), which exist in many different forms, efficient hazard screening is of utmost importance. Oxidative potential (OP), which is the ability of a substance to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS), is an important indicator of the potential to induce oxidative damage and oxidative stress. A frequently used assay to measure OP of NMs is the ferric reducing ability of serum (FRAS) assay. Although the widely used cuvette-based FRAS protocol is considered a robust assay, its low throughput makes the screening of multiple materials challenging. Here, we adapt the original cuvette-based FRAS assay protocol, into a 96-well format and thereby improve its user-friendliness, simplicity, and screening capacity. The adapted protocol allows for the screening of multiple NMs per plate, and multiple plates per day, where the original protocol allows for the screening of one NM dose-range per day. When comparing the two protocols, the adapted protocol showed slightly decreased assay precision as compared to the original protocol. The results obtained with the adapted protocol were compared using eight reference NMs in an interlaboratory study and showed acceptably low intra- and interlaboratory variation. We conclude that the adapted FRAS assay protocol is suitable to be used for hazard screening to facilitate SSbD and grouping approaches.

摘要

成功实施“设计安全与可持续”(SSbD)及分组方法需要简单、可靠且经济高效的检测方法,以在产品开发的早期阶段促进危害筛查。特别是对于存在多种不同形式的纳米材料(NMs)而言,高效的危害筛查至关重要。氧化潜力(OP)是一种物质诱导活性氧(ROS)的能力,是诱导氧化损伤和氧化应激潜力的重要指标。一种常用的测量纳米材料氧化潜力的检测方法是血清铁还原能力(FRAS)检测。尽管广泛使用的基于比色皿的FRAS方案被认为是一种可靠的检测方法,但其低通量使得对多种材料的筛查具有挑战性。在此,我们将原始的基于比色皿的FRAS检测方案改编为96孔板形式,从而提高其用户友好性、简易性和筛查能力。改编后的方案允许每板筛查多种纳米材料,每天筛查多个板,而原始方案每天仅允许筛查一个纳米材料剂量范围。在比较这两种方案时,改编后的方案与原始方案相比,检测精度略有下降。在一项实验室间研究中,使用八种参考纳米材料对改编后的方案所获得的结果进行了比较,结果显示实验室内部和实验室间的差异低至可接受水平。我们得出结论,改编后的FRAS检测方案适用于危害筛查,以促进SSbD和分组方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验