Suppr超能文献

口服与阴道用米索前列醇用于早期稽留流产药物治疗的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for medical management of first trimester missed abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Majeed Kanwal, Syed Hina, Murtaza Muzna, Hanif Zainab Muhammad, Ali Hassam

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Feb;305:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Missed abortion in the first trimester is characterized by the cessation of embryonic or fetal development while the cervix remains closed, often resulting in little to no bleeding. Ultrasound examinations typically reveal an empty gestational sac or an embryo/fetus that lacks cardiac activity. Misoprostol is the primary medication used to manage early pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of misoprostol, orally and vaginally in management of first trimester missed abortion."

STUDY SELECTION

This systematic review included randomised control trials of patients with a confirmed diagnosis with first-trimester missed abortion, comparing oral and vaginal misoprostol for uterine evacuation success, induction-expulsion time, patient satisfaction and adverse events.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. All of them are RCTs with a number of patients 1,142 [578 in oral misoprostol group and 564 in vaginal misoprostol group]. Independent data extraction and quality assessment ensured unbiased results. We estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs using random-effects meta-analysis and evaluated quality of the included studies using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2).

RESULTS

We included 10 studies in our analysis and for our primary outcome, vaginal misoprostol had a higher success rate, [RR: 0.85, P = 0.004], shorter induction-expulsion interval [MD:4.95, P = 0.0001], and greater patient satisfaction compared to oral administration [RR:0.85, P = 0.01]. Secondary outcomes revealed significantly higher nausea and vomiting in the oral group, with no significant difference in headache, dizziness, diarrhea, fever, excessive bleeding, or discharge. Severe crampy pain was also significantly higher in the oral group.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive review and meta-analysis indicate that the vaginal route of misoprostol is the most effective method for managing first-trimester missed abortions. This route achieves a significantly higher success rate and shorter induction- to-expulsion interval, along with greater patient satisfaction during follow-up sessions and fewer side effects.

摘要

背景

孕早期稽留流产的特征是胚胎或胎儿发育停止,而宫颈仍保持关闭,通常导致很少或没有出血。超声检查通常显示为空妊娠囊或无心跳的胚胎/胎儿。米索前列醇是用于处理早期妊娠丢失的主要药物。

目的

比较口服和阴道使用米索前列醇治疗孕早期稽留流产的疗效。

研究选择

本系统评价纳入了确诊为孕早期稽留流产患者的随机对照试验,比较口服和阴道使用米索前列醇在子宫排空成功率、引产-排出时间、患者满意度及不良事件方面的差异。

数据提取与分析

本荟萃分析纳入了10项研究。所有研究均为随机对照试验,共1142例患者[口服米索前列醇组578例,阴道米索前列醇组564例]。独立的数据提取和质量评估确保了结果的无偏性。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析估计风险比(RR)及95%可信区间(CI),并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)评估纳入研究的质量。

结果

我们的分析纳入了10项研究,对于主要结局,与口服给药相比,阴道使用米索前列醇有更高的成功率[RR:0.85,P = 0.004]、更短的引产-排出间隔[MD:4.95,P = 0.0001]以及更高的患者满意度[RR:0.85,P = 0.01]。次要结局显示口服组恶心和呕吐显著更多,而在头痛、头晕、腹泻、发热、大出血或分泌物方面无显著差异。口服组严重痉挛性疼痛也显著更多。

结论

我们的综合评价和荟萃分析表明,阴道途径使用米索前列醇是治疗孕早期稽留流产最有效的方法。该途径成功率显著更高、引产-排出间隔更短,随访期间患者满意度更高且副作用更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验