Hudon Anne, Miciak Maxi, Slade Teri, Lovo Stacey, Whittaker Jackie L, Côté Daniel, Feldman Debbie E, Kairy Dahlia, Laberge Marie, McKeen Beverley, Cooper Lynn, Gross Douglas P
École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain IURDPM, Montréal, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Dec 15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10261-4.
Despite evidence of efficacy, the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in real-world clinical settings is still largely unknown. Telerehabilitation requires a substantial transformation of the organization and delivery of traditional services. Considering that a virtual setting can create unique challenges for providing physiotherapy services and given the physical and potential hands-on nature of evidence-based assessments and interventions, it is important to investigate what injured workers think of receiving physiotherapy care via telerehabilitation and to examine if rehabilitation needs are adequately met.
A qualitative interpretive description study was conducted to explore the perspectives and experiences of 17 injured workers receiving physiotherapy via telerehabilitation. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants from three provinces in Western Canada and analysed using thematic analysis. Qualitative rigour criteria of epistemological integrity, analytic logic, interpretive authority, and representative credibility were considered throughout this study.
Implementation of telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in mixed perceptions from injured workers. Some viewed telerehabilitation as a resourceful option for providing services during the pandemic lockdown, resulting in maintained communications while overcoming barriers to services (e.g., rural/remote workers, transportation barriers, etc.). However, many thought telerehabilitation was inferior to in-person therapy for assessment and when 'hands-on' interaction was needed. Many believed a hybrid option may be ideal now that pandemic restrictions are lifted, with telerehabilitation supplementing in-person physiotherapy when needed.
Telerehabilitation was viewed as a resourceful option during the pandemic and in certain clinical situations (e.g., rural/remote). Workers should be able to make informed choices about service delivery format.
尽管有疗效证据,但远程康复在实际临床环境中的有效性仍 largely unknown。远程康复需要对传统服务的组织和提供方式进行重大变革。鉴于虚拟环境可能给提供物理治疗服务带来独特挑战,且考虑到循证评估和干预具有实际动手操作的性质,调查受伤工人对通过远程康复接受物理治疗的看法,并检查康复需求是否得到充分满足非常重要。
进行了一项定性解释性描述研究,以探索17名通过远程康复接受物理治疗的受伤工人的观点和经历。通过对加拿大西部三个省份的参与者进行半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用主题分析进行分析。在整个研究过程中,考虑了认识论完整性、分析逻辑、解释权威性和代表性可信度等定性严谨标准。
在新冠疫情期间实施远程康复,受伤工人的看法不一。一些人认为远程康复是疫情封锁期间提供服务的一种有益选择,在克服服务障碍(如农村/偏远地区工人、交通障碍等)的同时保持了沟通。然而,许多人认为在需要评估和“实际动手”互动时,远程康复不如面对面治疗。许多人认为,既然疫情限制已经解除,混合模式可能是理想的选择,即远程康复在需要时补充面对面物理治疗。
远程康复在疫情期间和某些临床情况下(如农村/偏远地区)被视为一种有益选择。工人应该能够就服务提供形式做出明智的选择。