Miller Eliza C, Conley Patrick, Alirezaei Mohammad, Wolfova Katrin, Gonzales Mitzi M, Tan Zaldy S, Tom Sarah E, Yee Lynn M, Brickman Adam M, Bello Natalie A
Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2024 Dec;5(12):100660. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.100660. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Individuals with adverse pregnancy outcomes have an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, but the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cognitive impairment and dementia is less well established. We aimed to synthesise, combine, and assess the growing body of data examining the associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and mild cognitive impairment and dementia in parous women.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase from database inception up to July 18, 2024, with no language restrictions, for observational studies or clinical trials that reported mild cognitive impairment or dementia as outcomes and included female individuals or women who had an adverse pregnancy outcome, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, or placental abruption. We excluded studies of men, nulliparous women, women with pre-pregnancy conditions associated with impaired cognition, and studies examining cognitive impairment within 6 months of pregnancy. Database searches were supplemented by manual review of the reference lists of included studies. If studies met eligibility criteria but did not have sufficient data for meta-analysis (ie, did not report a summary statistic or a hazard ratio [HR] for outcome estimation), they were included in the systematic review and excluded from the meta-analysis. After removing duplicates, two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence software, with potentially eligible studies undergoing full-text review by the same reviewers, with further review by a third reviewer and disagreements resolved by discussion and group consensus. Study quality was assessed and summary statistics extracted by two reviewers independently. The primary outcomes of our study were mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q test and I statistic, and we used random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting to assess the association between adverse pregnancy outcome and primary outcomes with sufficient meta-analysable data via pooled adjusted HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023453511.
Of 11 251 publications identified, 15 studies (including 7 347 202 participants) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review, and 11 studies (6 263 431 participants) had sufficient data for meta-analysis. A history of any adverse pregnancy outcome was associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (adjusted HR 1·32 [95% CI 1·17-1·49]; I= 80%), Alzheimer's disease (1·26 [1·04-1·53]; I=63%), and vascular dementia (1·94 [1·70-2·21]; I=0%). A history of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy was significantly associated with all-cause dementia (1·32 [1·11-1·57]; I=74%) and vascular dementia (1·78 [1·46-2·17]; I=0%), but not Alzheimer's disease (1·24 [0·98-1·57]; I=66%). Stillbirth was not significantly associated with higher risk of all-cause dementia (1·26 [95% CI 0·93-1·71]; I=62%). In individual studies, similar effect directions were observed for preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but data were insufficient for meta-analysis.
Given their increased risk of dementia, women with a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes should be evaluated for additional dementia risk factors and monitored closely for any signs of cognitive decline. Furthermore, to obtain more reliable findings, future studies should measure both exposures and outcomes prospectively and objectively.
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute on Aging, and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
有不良妊娠结局的个体患脑血管疾病的风险增加,但不良妊娠结局与认知障碍及痴呆之间的关联尚不明确。我们旨在综合、合并并评估越来越多的关于经产妇不良妊娠结局与轻度认知障碍及痴呆之间关联的数据。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed(MEDLINE)、Web of Science和Embase数据库,检索时间从建库至2024年7月18日,无语言限制,以查找将轻度认知障碍或痴呆作为结局报告的观察性研究或临床试验,纳入有不良妊娠结局的女性个体,包括妊娠高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病、死产、胎儿生长受限、早产或胎盘早剥。我们排除了男性、未生育女性、孕前存在与认知受损相关疾病的女性的研究,以及妊娠6个月内检查认知障碍的研究。通过人工查阅纳入研究的参考文献列表对数据库检索进行补充。如果研究符合纳入标准但没有足够数据进行荟萃分析(即未报告结局估计的汇总统计量或风险比[HR]),则将其纳入系统评价并排除在荟萃分析之外。去除重复项后,两名研究者使用Covidence软件独立筛选标题和摘要,潜在符合条件的研究由相同的审阅者进行全文审阅,第三名审阅者进一步审阅,分歧通过讨论和小组共识解决。两名审阅者独立评估研究质量并提取汇总统计量。我们研究的主要结局为轻度认知障碍、全因性痴呆、阿尔茨海默病和血管性痴呆。使用Q检验和I统计量测量异质性,我们使用具有逆方差加权的随机效应模型,通过合并调整后的HR和95%CI评估不良妊娠结局与有足够荟萃分析数据的主要结局之间的关联。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42023453511。
在识别出的11251篇出版物中,15项研究(包括7347202名参与者)符合系统评价的纳入标准,11项研究(6263431名参与者)有足够数据进行荟萃分析。任何不良妊娠结局史均与全因性痴呆(调整后HR 1.32[95%CI 1.17 - 1.49];I = 80%)、阿尔茨海默病(1.26[1.04 - 1.53];I = 63%)和血管性痴呆(1.94[1.70 - 2.21];I = 0%)的较高风险相关。任何妊娠高血压疾病史均与全因性痴呆(1.32[1.11 - 1.57];I = 74%)和血管性痴呆(1.78[1.46 - 2.17];I = 0%)显著相关,但与阿尔茨海默病无关(1.24[0.98 - 1.57];I = 66%)。死产与全因性痴呆的较高风险无显著关联(1.26[95%CI 0.93 - 1.71];I = 62%)。在个体研究中,早产和胎儿生长受限观察到类似的效应方向,但数据不足以进行荟萃分析。
鉴于有不良妊娠结局史的女性患痴呆的风险增加,应评估其是否存在其他痴呆风险因素,并密切监测其认知下降的任何迹象。此外,为获得更可靠的结果,未来研究应前瞻性、客观地测量暴露因素和结局。
美国国立卫生研究院、国立神经疾病和中风研究所、国立衰老研究所和国立心肺血液研究所。