Chen Ronald C, Fuldeore Rupali, Greatsinger Alexandra, Hepp Zsolt, Liu Qing, Wright Phoebe, Xie Bin, Yang Hongbo, Young Christopher, Zhang Adina, Mucha Lisa
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS.
HEOR Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL.
Urol Oncol. 2025 Mar;43(3):189.e9-189.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.010. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
Given the changing treatment landscape for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC), this study aimed to describe real-world treatments, overall survival (OS), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among US patients with la/mUC receiving first-line therapy.
This retrospective study was conducted using 100% Medicare claims data (2015-2020). Patients with la/mUC were selected; initiation of first-line therapy was the index date. Treatments and OS were assessed during follow-up (index date to the earliest of end of data availability, health plan coverage, or death). All-cause HCRU and costs (2021 USD) were assessed during the first-line treatment period (index date to the earliest of first-line discontinuation, switch to second-line therapy, end of follow-up, or death). Outpatient pharmacy costs were not included. All-cause OS from start of first-line therapy was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. The HCRU, cost, and OS analyses were stratified by 3 index treatment groups-platinum-based chemotherapy, non-platinum-based chemotherapy, and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitor monotherapy-and adjusted for baseline characteristics.
Of 9,939 patients included, 77.1% were men and mean age was 76 years. In total, 5,050 (50.8%) received platinum-based chemotherapy, 1,361 (13.7%) received non-platinum-based chemotherapy, and 3,242 (32.6%) received PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy for first-line la/mUC. Median OS was 12.9, 12.9 (P = 0.960), and 9.0 months (P < 0.001) with platinum-based chemotherapy (reference), non-platinum-based chemotherapy, and PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy, respectively. Most (> 99%) patients had ≥ 1 outpatient visit during the treatment period; mean number of visits per patient was 13.1 with platinum-based chemotherapy, 10.5 with non-platinum-based chemotherapy, and 18.3 with PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy. In general, HCRU was significantly lower for patients receiving PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy. However, costs were significantly higher with PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy. Mean total monthly cost per patient was $10,285 for platinum-based chemotherapy, $8,982 for non-platinum-based chemotherapy, and $18,147 for PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy.
From 2015 to 2020, patients with la/mUC had substantial HCRU and costs and short survival, regardless of first-line treatment. More effective therapies were needed to prolong survival and reduce the economic burden of la/mUC.
鉴于局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)的治疗格局不断变化,本研究旨在描述美国接受一线治疗的la/mUC患者的真实世界治疗情况、总生存期(OS)、医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)及费用。
本回顾性研究使用了100%的医疗保险索赔数据(2015 - 2020年)。选取la/mUC患者;一线治疗开始日期为索引日期。在随访期间(索引日期至数据可获取结束、健康计划覆盖结束或死亡三者中最早的日期)评估治疗情况和总生存期。在一线治疗期间(索引日期至一线治疗停药、转为二线治疗、随访结束或死亡三者中最早的日期)评估全因HCRU和费用(2021美元)。不包括门诊药房费用。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计从一线治疗开始的全因总生存期。HCRU、费用和总生存期分析按3个索引治疗组进行分层——铂类化疗、非铂类化疗和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/配体1(PD-1/L1)抑制剂单药治疗——并根据基线特征进行调整。
纳入的9939例患者中,77.1%为男性,平均年龄为76岁。总计5050例(50.8%)接受铂类化疗,1361例(13.7%)接受非铂类化疗,3242例(32.6%)接受PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗作为一线la/mUC治疗。铂类化疗(参照组)、非铂类化疗和PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗的中位总生存期分别为12.9个月、12.9个月(P = 0.960)和9.0个月(P < 0.001)。大多数(> 99%)患者在治疗期间有≥1次门诊就诊;接受铂类化疗的患者人均就诊次数为13.1次,接受非铂类化疗的患者为10.5次,接受PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗的患者为18.3次。总体而言,接受PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗的患者的HCRU显著低于接受铂类化疗的患者。然而,PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗的费用显著高于铂类化疗。接受铂类化疗的患者每月人均总费用为10285美元,接受非铂类化疗的患者为8982美元,接受PD-1/L1抑制剂单药治疗的患者为18147美元。
2015年至2020年期间,无论一线治疗如何,la/mUC患者都有大量的HCRU和费用,且生存期较短。需要更有效的治疗方法来延长生存期并减轻la/mUC的经济负担。