Jacobs Marni B, Clark Alex E, Goldhaber Nicole H, Valentine Holly D, Rivera Andrea, Ngo Toan, Barber Tom, Holmes Jacqueline, Manfredi Brittany, Garretson Aaron F, Bray William, Knight Rob, Longhurst Christopher A, Carlin Aaron F, De Hoff Peter, Laurent Louise C
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
Department of Medicine, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
J Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 15;231(4):921-930. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae622.
SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels have been proposed as a correlate of protection from infection. Yet, large-scale prospective studies of cost-effective scalable antibody measures as predictors of infection under real-world conditions are limited. We examined whether antibody levels measured by high-throughput variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) neutralization assays correlate with cell-based neutralizing antibody measurements and whether they can serve as a reasonable correlate of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We conducted a large institutional cohort study between January 2022 and March 2023. Participants (N = 2513) provided dried blood spot (DBS) samples for assessment of anti-spike IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels through high-throughput assays. Comparison with authentic cell-based SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody assays was conducted with serum samples (n = 105). Associations between antibody levels and risk of infection were evaluated.
Correlation between serum and DBS sampling and between cell-based neutralizing and high-throughput antibody binding assays was high for anti-spike IgG and ACE2 neutralization, though the degree of correlation varied by variant. Longitudinal evaluation suggested that DBS-based IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels were anticorrelated with infection risk, with higher sensitivity noted for ACE2 inhibition and variant-matched measures. IgG and ACE2 inhibition levels decreased over time, with more durable responses observed in participants whose most recent priming event was infection vs vaccination.
Findings suggest that variant-specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may be a useful correlate of protection for infection, which has important implications for vaccination recommendations and evaluating infection risk. High-throughput assays measured via DBS may have utility in timing of boosters at the population or individual level.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体水平已被认为是预防感染的一个相关指标。然而,在现实世界条件下,作为感染预测指标的具有成本效益且可扩展的抗体检测方法的大规模前瞻性研究有限。我们研究了通过高通量变异株特异性SARS-CoV-2抗刺突免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)中和试验测量的抗体水平是否与基于细胞的中和抗体测量相关,以及它们是否可作为预防SARS-CoV-2感染的合理相关指标。
我们在2022年1月至2023年3月期间进行了一项大型机构队列研究。参与者(N = 2513)提供干血斑(DBS)样本,通过高通量试验评估抗刺突IgG和ACE2抑制水平。用血清样本(n = 105)与基于细胞的真实SARS-CoV-2中和抗体试验进行比较。评估抗体水平与感染风险之间的关联。
对于抗刺突IgG和ACE2中和,血清与DBS采样之间以及基于细胞的中和与高通量抗体结合试验之间的相关性很高,尽管相关性程度因变异株而异。纵向评估表明,基于DBS的IgG和ACE2抑制水平与感染风险呈负相关关系:ACE2抑制和变异株匹配检测的敏感性更高。IgG和ACE2抑制水平随时间下降,与疫苗接种相比,在最近一次激发事件为感染的参与者中观察到更持久的反应。
研究结果表明,变异株特异性SARS-CoV-2抗体水平可能是预防感染的有用相关指标,这对疫苗接种建议和评估感染风险具有重要意义。通过DBS测量的高通量试验可能在人群或个体层面的加强针接种时机方面具有实用性。