Yu Ya-Hui, Platt Robert W, Reynier Pauline, Yu Oriana H Y, Filion Kristian B
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Feb;27(2):976-986. doi: 10.1111/dom.16115. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Metformin is increasingly used off-label as the treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM). Our objective was to determine if metformin versus insulin initiation is associated with the adverse pregnancy outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, its pregnancy register, and Hospital Episode Statistics from 1998 to 2018. We included pregnancies of women who initiated metformin or insulin between 20 weeks gestation and pregnancy end. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia. The secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, caesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (HDP). Inverse probability weighted-Cox proportional hazards models were to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing those who initiated metformin versus insulin at cohort entry, accounting for baseline covariates.
Our cohort included pregnancies of 1297 women initiating metformin and of 895 women initiating insulin. Compared to insulin initiation, metformin initiation was associated with a decreased risk of LGA or macrosomia (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49, 0.78), Caesarean delivery (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69, 0.98), and preterm birth (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58, 1.08). The HRs for HDP and SGA were 0.92 (95% CI 0.57, 1.27) and 1.33 (95% CI 0.67, 2.00), respectively.
Our study suggests that, compared to initiating insulin, initiating metformin is associated with decreased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with GDM. These findings provide important real-world evidence regarding the use of metformin for GDM.
二甲双胍越来越多地被用于妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的非标签治疗。我们的目的是确定起始使用二甲双胍与起始使用胰岛素相比是否与不良妊娠结局相关。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了临床实践研究数据链、其妊娠登记册以及1998年至2018年的医院事件统计数据。我们纳入了在妊娠20周与妊娠结束之间起始使用二甲双胍或胰岛素的孕妇。主要结局是大于胎龄儿(LGA)和巨大儿的复合结局。次要结局包括小于胎龄儿(SGA)、早产、剖宫产以及妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP)。采用逆概率加权Cox比例风险模型来估计调整后的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),比较队列入组时起始使用二甲双胍与起始使用胰岛素的人群,并考虑基线协变量。
我们的队列包括1297名起始使用二甲双胍的孕妇和895名起始使用胰岛素的孕妇。与起始使用胰岛素相比,起始使用二甲双胍与LGA或巨大儿风险降低(HR 0.64,95%CI 0.49,0.78)以及剖宫产(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.69,0.98)和早产风险降低(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.58,1.08)相关。HDP和SGA的HR分别为0.92(95%CI 0.57,1.27)和1.33(95%CI 0.67,2.00)。
我们的研究表明,与起始使用胰岛素相比,起始使用二甲双胍与GDM女性不良妊娠结局风险降低相关。这些发现为二甲双胍用于GDM提供了重要的真实世界证据。