Irving Camille, Durrmeyer Xavier, Decobert Fabrice, Dassieu Gilles, Ben Guirat Aroua, Gouyon Béatrice, Tauzin Manon
Réanimation néonatale Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil Créteil France.
Université Paris Est Créteil, Faculté de Santé de Créteil, IMRB, GRC CARMAS Créteil France.
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2024 Jul 19;6(4):194-202. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12130. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Analgesia and sedation are often provided during mechanical ventilation in extremely preterm neonates. Opioids and benzodiazepines are the most frequently used agents but can have adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 agonist, might be interesting to spare opioid and benzodiazepine use. The objective of this study was to describe a cohort of mechanically ventilated extremely, preterm infants treated with morphine with or without dexmedetomidine. This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study in the neonatal intensive care unit of Creteil. We included preterm neonates born before 28 weeks of gestation and/or weighting less than 1000 g hospitalized between July 2017 and June 2020, on mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h and who received morphine with or without dexmedetomidine as a second- or third-line treatment. We described morphine and midazolam exposure, respiratory, and digestive outcomes for patients who received dexmedetomidine and those who did not. Twenty nine preterm infants received morphine and dexmedetomidine, and 44 received morphine without dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine was used in patients of 25.7 [25.1-26.7] weeks, 680 [600-750] g and significantly more often in patients with vascular complications during pregnancy ( = 0.008), intrauterine growth restriction ( = 0.01) and in patients who received higher cumulative doses of morphine ( = 0.01). Morphine and midazolam doses tended to decrease after the introduction of dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine was never discontinued because of side effects. In this study, dexmedetomidine, used as a second or third-line treatment during mechanical ventilation, was associated with a decrease in morphine and midazolam doses after introduction. Dexmedetomidine was used in a specific population of extremely preterm infants, with severe respiratory disease, who required prolonged mechanical ventilation and high morphine doses. This study highlights the need for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in this population, followed by randomized controlled trials and studies on the long-term effects of dexmedetomidine to determine its place in analgosedation of ventilated preterm infants.
在极早产儿机械通气期间,常给予镇痛和镇静治疗。阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物是最常用的药物,但可能有不良反应。右美托咪定是一种α-2激动剂,减少阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物的使用可能会很有意义。本研究的目的是描述一组接受吗啡治疗的机械通气极早产儿队列,其中部分患儿同时使用或未使用右美托咪定。这是一项在克雷泰伊新生儿重症监护病房进行的回顾性、观察性单中心研究。我们纳入了2017年7月至2020年6月期间住院的妊娠28周前出生和/或体重小于1000克的极早产儿,他们接受机械通气至少72小时,并接受吗啡作为二线或三线治疗,部分患儿同时使用或未使用右美托咪定。我们描述了接受右美托咪定和未接受右美托咪定患儿的吗啡和咪达唑仑暴露情况、呼吸及消化结局。29例极早产儿接受了吗啡和右美托咪定,44例接受了吗啡但未使用右美托咪定。接受右美托咪定治疗的患儿孕周为25.7[25.1 - 26.7]周,体重680[600 - 750]克,且在孕期有血管并发症(P = 0.008)、宫内生长受限(P = 0.01)的患儿以及接受吗啡累积剂量较高的患儿(P = 0.01)中使用右美托咪定的频率显著更高。引入右美托咪定后,吗啡和咪达唑仑的剂量有下降趋势。右美托咪定从未因副作用而停药。在本研究中,右美托咪定在机械通气期间作为二线或三线治疗使用,引入后与吗啡和咪达唑仑剂量的降低相关。右美托咪定用于特定的极早产儿群体,这些患儿患有严重呼吸系统疾病,需要长时间机械通气且吗啡剂量较高。本研究强调了对此类人群进行药代动力学/药效学研究的必要性,随后进行随机对照试验以及关于右美托咪定长期影响的研究,以确定其在机械通气早产儿镇痛镇静中的地位。