Osun Oyindamola G, Ahmed Abdulmalik S, Suliman Salma A, Olorunfemi Adedolapo B, Thomas Bolaji N, Ojurongbe Olusola
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Ogbomoso, NGA.
Department of Life Sciences, Kano State Polytechnic, Kano, NGA.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 15;16(11):e73739. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73739. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background Malaria, a persistent public health issue in Nigeria, particularly among children, is often complicated by misdiagnosis, hindering effective treatment and control. The global adoption of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria has significantly improved management. This study, therefore, compares the diagnostic performance of microscopy, RDT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Plasmodium falciparum detection in children in Kano state, Nigeria, providing crucial insights for effective control and elimination. Methods Capillary blood samples and dried blood spots (DBS) were collected from 200 febrile children in a selected health center in Kano and systematically tested using RDT, microscopy, and nested polymerase PCR. The sensitivity and specificity for each diagnostic method were calculated, with nested PCR as the reference to assess diagnostic accuracy. Structured questionnaires were used to obtain information on possible risk factors. Data were analyzed using univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results Out of the 200 children enrolled in the study, 112 (56%) tested positive by microscopy, 60 (30%) by RDT, and 70 (35%) by PCR. Using PCR (n=70) as the reference test, microscopy demonstrated a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 53%, while the RDT exhibited a lower sensitivity of 27% but a higher specificity of 68%. False positivity rates of 22 (31.5%) for RDT and 33 (46.9%) for microscopy were observed. Regarding false negatives, RDT had a much higher rate of 51 (72.9%) than microscopy of 19 (27.1%). Conclusion The study divulges the limitations of RDT in malaria detection, particularly its low sensitivity. With its higher sensitivity, microscopy also showed a significant false-positive rate. The study suggests a practical solution combining RDT and microscopy for routine malaria diagnosis, which could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. More ongoing research is needed to develop more suitable RDTs for routine malaria diagnosis in endemic communities.
背景 疟疾是尼日利亚持续存在的公共卫生问题,在儿童中尤为突出,常因误诊而复杂化,阻碍了有效治疗和控制。全球采用疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)显著改善了管理。因此,本研究比较了显微镜检查、RDT和聚合酶链反应(PCR)在尼日利亚卡诺州儿童中检测恶性疟原虫的诊断性能,为有效控制和消除疟疾提供了关键见解。方法 从卡诺一家选定健康中心的200名发热儿童中采集毛细血管血样和干血斑(DBS),并使用RDT、显微镜检查和巢式聚合酶PCR进行系统检测。计算每种诊断方法的敏感性和特异性,以巢式PCR作为参考来评估诊断准确性。使用结构化问卷获取有关可能危险因素的信息。采用单变量、双变量和多变量分析对数据进行分析,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果 在纳入研究的200名儿童中,112名(56%)通过显微镜检查呈阳性,60名(30%)通过RDT呈阳性,70名(35%)通过PCR呈阳性。以PCR(n = 70)作为参考检测,显微镜检查的敏感性为73%,特异性为53%,而RDT的敏感性较低,为27%,但特异性较高,为68%。观察到RDT的假阳性率为22例(31.5%),显微镜检查的假阳性率为33例(46.9%)。关于假阴性,RDT的假阴性率(51例,72.9%)远高于显微镜检查(19例,27.1%)。结论 该研究揭示了RDT在疟疾检测中的局限性,尤其是其低敏感性。显微镜检查虽然敏感性较高,但也显示出显著的假阳性率。该研究建议将RDT和显微镜检查结合用于常规疟疾诊断的实用解决方案,这可以显著提高诊断准确性。需要更多正在进行的研究来开发更适合流行社区常规疟疾诊断的RDT。