Warner Shelley, Patel Janavi, Tannenbaum Stacey L, Kessler Rachel, Lehr Gary
General Surgery, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
College of Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 12;16(11):e73560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73560. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Background Gallstone disease significantly burdens the United States healthcare system. While ultrasonography (US), physical exam, and laboratory findings are the recommended primary workup and diagnostic modalities, hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA) scans are occasionally used as an adjunct for diagnosis. This study evaluates HIDA scan utilization in comparison to clinical and US findings based on the Tokyo guidelines for diagnosing acute cholecystitis. Methods This retrospective study included 159 patients admitted with gallbladder disease from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Patients were classified by the Tokyo guidelines as having no cholecystitis, suspected, or definite cholecystitis. The primary outcome was HIDA scan overutilization, defined as HIDA scans performed despite clinical criteria for cholecystitis. Secondary outcomes included HIDA scan use in complicated gallbladder disease and the effect of admission day on HIDA scan ordering. Results Of the 159 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 101 (63.5%) met the Tokyo guidelines for suspected or definite cholecystitis. Over half, 54 (53.5%) of these patients received HIDA scans, indicating overutilization. Additionally, no significant difference in HIDA scan utilization was observed based on the day of admission. Among patients with complicated gallbladder disease, 29 (38.2%) underwent a HIDA scan, which was deemed unnecessary. Conclusion HIDA scans are significantly overutilized in patients meeting clinical criteria for cholecystitis based on the Tokyo guidelines and those with complicated gallbladder disease. Overuse increases healthcare costs and delays care. HIDA scans should be reserved for cases with inconclusive US results but high clinical suspicion for cholecystitis. Proper utilization and reduction of unnecessary HIDA scans could improve patient care efficiency and reduce healthcare expenditures.
胆结石疾病给美国医疗保健系统带来了沉重负担。虽然超声检查(US)、体格检查和实验室检查结果是推荐的主要检查和诊断方式,但肝胆闪烁显像(HIDA)扫描偶尔也用作诊断辅助手段。本研究根据东京急性胆囊炎诊断指南,评估HIDA扫描的使用情况,并与临床和超声检查结果进行比较。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间因胆囊疾病入院的159例患者。根据东京指南,将患者分为无胆囊炎、疑似或确诊胆囊炎。主要结局是HIDA扫描过度使用,定义为尽管有胆囊炎的临床标准仍进行HIDA扫描。次要结局包括HIDA扫描在复杂胆囊疾病中的使用情况以及入院日对HIDA扫描医嘱的影响。结果:在159例行胆囊切除术的患者中,101例(63.5%)符合东京指南中疑似或确诊胆囊炎的标准。其中超过一半,即54例(53.5%)患者接受了HIDA扫描,表明存在过度使用情况。此外,根据入院日未观察到HIDA扫描使用情况的显著差异。在患有复杂胆囊疾病的患者中,29例(38.2%)接受了HIDA扫描,被认为是不必要的。结论:根据东京指南,在符合胆囊炎临床标准的患者以及患有复杂胆囊疾病的患者中,HIDA扫描存在显著过度使用情况。过度使用会增加医疗成本并延误治疗。HIDA扫描应仅用于超声检查结果不明确但临床高度怀疑胆囊炎的病例。合理使用并减少不必要的HIDA扫描可提高患者护理效率并降低医疗支出。