Suppr超能文献

综合内科病房谵妄的筛查:速示器与整体可及性评分

Screening for delirium on a general medical ward: the tachistoscope and a global accessibility rating.

作者信息

Anthony J C, LeResche L A, Von Korff M R, Niaz U, Folstein M F

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(85)90008-8.

Abstract

With a psychiatrist's standardized clinical diagnosis as the criterion, the "Hand-Held Tachistoscope" was 100% sensitive, but only 45% specific in detecting delirium among hospital patients on a general medical ward. For each true positive in this sample of 97 patients, there were almost 5 false positives. The 10 patients with clinically diagnosed delirium could not see the stimulus. This was also true for 24 of the 87 nondelirious patients. Performance on the tachistoscope was related to age and education. This was not true for another method of delirium case detection, the global accessibility rating. This rating was 90% sensitive and 95% specific when compared with the psychiatric diagnosis, and was stable across two days of ratings. The global accessibility rating warrants further evaluation as a simple screening test for delirium.

摘要

以精神科医生的标准化临床诊断为标准,“手持式速示器”在综合内科病房的住院患者中检测谵妄时,灵敏度为100%,但特异度仅为45%。在这97名患者的样本中,每出现1例真阳性,就几乎有5例假阳性。临床诊断为谵妄的10名患者无法看到刺激物。87名非谵妄患者中有24名也是如此。速示器的表现与年龄和教育程度有关。谵妄病例检测的另一种方法——整体可及性评分则并非如此。与精神科诊断相比,该评分的灵敏度为90%,特异度为95%,且在两天的评分中保持稳定。整体可及性评分作为一种简单的谵妄筛查测试值得进一步评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验