Anthony J C, LeResche L A, Von Korff M R, Niaz U, Folstein M F
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(85)90008-8.
With a psychiatrist's standardized clinical diagnosis as the criterion, the "Hand-Held Tachistoscope" was 100% sensitive, but only 45% specific in detecting delirium among hospital patients on a general medical ward. For each true positive in this sample of 97 patients, there were almost 5 false positives. The 10 patients with clinically diagnosed delirium could not see the stimulus. This was also true for 24 of the 87 nondelirious patients. Performance on the tachistoscope was related to age and education. This was not true for another method of delirium case detection, the global accessibility rating. This rating was 90% sensitive and 95% specific when compared with the psychiatric diagnosis, and was stable across two days of ratings. The global accessibility rating warrants further evaluation as a simple screening test for delirium.
以精神科医生的标准化临床诊断为标准,“手持式速示器”在综合内科病房的住院患者中检测谵妄时,灵敏度为100%,但特异度仅为45%。在这97名患者的样本中,每出现1例真阳性,就几乎有5例假阳性。临床诊断为谵妄的10名患者无法看到刺激物。87名非谵妄患者中有24名也是如此。速示器的表现与年龄和教育程度有关。谵妄病例检测的另一种方法——整体可及性评分则并非如此。与精神科诊断相比,该评分的灵敏度为90%,特异度为95%,且在两天的评分中保持稳定。整体可及性评分作为一种简单的谵妄筛查测试值得进一步评估。