Anoschin Albert, Zürn Michael K, Remmers Carina
Department of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine, HMU Health and Medical University Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions (NIM), Nuremberg, Germany.
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Sep 30;6(3):e11381. doi: 10.32872/cpe.11381. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Rather than being rooted in deliberate reflection, the experience of meaning has been shown to evolve from intuitive processes (Heintzelman & King, 2013b, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_7). Accordingly, experiential and reflective dimensions of meaning in life can be distinguished (Hill et al., 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2018.1434483). In this preregistered study, we explored how these dimensions are longitudinally associated with psychopathological symptoms. We expected that experiencing more meaning would predict fewer depressive symptoms and fewer personality functioning impairments six months later, whereas reflecting about meaning would predict more psychopathological symptoms.
A German-speaking sample of = 388 completed self-report measures assessing meaning in life, depression, and personality functioning at baseline and six months later.
Controlling for depression at baseline, elevated levels of experiencing meaning in life predicted a decrease in depressive symptoms. Experiencing meaning did not predict personality functioning impairments six months later. However, exploratory analyses with a larger sample tentatively showed that experiencing meaning in life predicted less impairments in personality functioning. Evidence supporting the hypothesized association between reflection and future depression as well as future personality functioning impairments was discerned through exploratory analyses. Generalizability of results to clinical care settings is limited due to the studied non-clinical sample. No causal conclusions can be drawn from the data because the study employed an observational design with two assessment points.
Experiencing meaning in life emerged as a potential protective factor against future psychopathological symptoms, whereas exploratory analyses pointed to an opposite relationship for reflection about meaning in life. Results are discussed with regard to clinical implications and directions for future research.
意义体验并非源于深思熟虑,而是从直觉过程中演变而来(海因策尔曼和金,2013b,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_7)。因此,可以区分生活意义的体验维度和反思维度(希尔等人,2019,https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2018.1434483)。在这项预先注册的研究中,我们探讨了这些维度如何与心理病理症状纵向相关。我们预期,体验到更多的意义将预示着六个月后抑郁症状减少,人格功能受损减少,而对意义的反思将预示着更多的心理病理症状。
388名讲德语的样本在基线和六个月后完成了自我报告测量,评估生活意义、抑郁和人格功能。
在控制基线抑郁的情况下,生活意义体验水平的提高预示着抑郁症状的减少。体验意义并不能预测六个月后的人格功能受损。然而,对更大样本的探索性分析初步表明,生活意义体验预示着人格功能受损较少。通过探索性分析发现了支持反思与未来抑郁以及未来人格功能受损之间假设关联的证据。由于所研究的是非临床样本,因此结果在临床护理环境中的可推广性有限。由于该研究采用了具有两个评估点的观察性设计,因此无法从数据中得出因果结论。
生活意义体验成为预防未来心理病理症状的潜在保护因素,而探索性分析表明生活意义反思与之呈相反关系。讨论了结果的临床意义和未来研究方向。