Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Pain Med. 2022 Feb 1;23(2):314-325. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab321.
Although considered the first-line psychological treatment for chronic pain, cognitive behavioral therapy has recently been criticized as being too limited, insufficient, and sometimes ineffective in the treatment of patients with chronic pain. Moreover, important existential perspectives are sparsely or not at all integrated into cognitive behavioral therapy. We therefore propose to complement chronic pain treatment with a meaning-based intervention, the Sources of Meaning Card Method (SoMeCaM). This study tested its efficacy.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 42 patients with chronic pain. The trial compared an intervention group (standard care and participation in the SoMeCaM, a meaning-oriented approach) with a control group (standard care). We evaluated both groups at baseline and at 1 (t1) and 2 months (t2) after the intervention. The primary outcome assessed was pain acceptance, while depression, anxiety, pain intensity, pain medication, satisfaction with life, meaningfulness, and crisis of meaning were examined as secondary outcomes.
Comparisons within and between groups showed significant treatment effects at t1. Higher increases in pain acceptance and decreases in anxiety, depression, and crisis of meaning were observed in the intervention group. Improvements in pain acceptance and anxiety persisted until t2, when pain intensity was also lower. Effect sizes at t2 were medium to large.
Our preliminary work demonstrates the importance of the existential perspective in chronic pain therapy.
认知行为疗法虽被认为是慢性疼痛的一线心理治疗方法,但最近却因其在慢性疼痛患者治疗中的局限性、不足和有时无效而受到批评。此外,认知行为疗法很少或根本没有纳入重要的存在主义观点。因此,我们建议用一种基于意义的干预措施——意义源卡片方法(SoMeCaM)来补充慢性疼痛的治疗。本研究测试了它的疗效。
对 42 名慢性疼痛患者进行了一项随机对照试验。试验将干预组(标准护理和参加 SoMeCaM,一种以意义为导向的方法)与对照组(标准护理)进行了比较。我们在基线和干预后 1 个月(t1)和 2 个月(t2)评估了这两组。主要结果是疼痛接受度,同时还评估了抑郁、焦虑、疼痛强度、疼痛药物治疗、生活满意度、意义感和意义危机作为次要结果。
组内和组间比较显示,t1 时治疗效果显著。干预组疼痛接受度的增加和焦虑、抑郁和意义危机的降低更为明显。疼痛接受度和焦虑的改善一直持续到 t2,此时疼痛强度也较低。t2 时的效应大小为中到大。
我们的初步工作表明,存在主义观点在慢性疼痛治疗中很重要。