• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程医疗与传统面对面就诊中患者与医生同理心的比较研究。

A comparative study of patient-physician empathy in telehealth and traditional in-person visits.

作者信息

Jabour Abdulrahman M

机构信息

Department of Public Health, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Dec 12;10:20552076241305284. doi: 10.1177/20552076241305284. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241305284
PMID:39679005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11639010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rise of telemedicine has brought significant changes to patient care, especially regarding the experience of empathy and connection during consultations. Understanding how telemedicine compares to in-person visits in terms of patient-physician interactions and the perception of empathy is crucial for optimizing telehealth services.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare patient-physician interaction ratings between telemedicine and in-person visits across the 10 items of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure. Additionally, it seeks to identify any significant differences in interaction ratings between male and female patients within these contexts.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 320 participants who had either telemedicine or in-person consultations. Participants were assigned to the telehealth or in-person group based on the type of consultation they experienced. The CARE measure was utilized to capture patient's perspective of the quality of the interaction. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the ratings between the two groups.

RESULTS

The study found no significant differences in overall CARE measure ratings between telemedicine and in-person visits. However, male patients reported higher satisfaction with telemedicine on several items compared to in-person visits, whereas female patients showed no significant differences in their ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine is as effective as in-person visits in maintaining high-quality patient-physician interactions. The findings also suggest gender-specific preferences that could inform the optimization of telemedicine practices. Further research is recommended to explore these differences in more diverse populations.

摘要

背景

远程医疗的兴起给患者护理带来了重大变化,尤其是在会诊期间的同理心体验和联系方面。了解远程医疗与面对面就诊在医患互动以及同理心感知方面的比较,对于优化远程医疗服务至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在比较远程医疗和面对面就诊在会诊与关系同理心(CARE)量表的10个项目上的医患互动评分。此外,它还试图确定在这些情况下男性和女性患者之间互动评分的任何显著差异。

方法

进行了一项横断面研究,涉及320名进行过远程医疗或面对面会诊的参与者。根据他们所经历的会诊类型,将参与者分配到远程医疗组或面对面组。使用CARE量表来获取患者对互动质量的看法。进行统计分析以比较两组之间的评分。

结果

研究发现,远程医疗和面对面就诊在CARE量表总体评分上没有显著差异。然而,与面对面就诊相比,男性患者在几个项目上对远程医疗的满意度更高,而女性患者的评分没有显著差异。

结论

远程医疗在维持高质量医患互动方面与面对面就诊一样有效。研究结果还表明了特定性别的偏好,这可为优化远程医疗实践提供参考。建议进一步开展研究,以在更多样化的人群中探索这些差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ec/11639010/3fd3f05632e8/10.1177_20552076241305284-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ec/11639010/3fd3f05632e8/10.1177_20552076241305284-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ec/11639010/3fd3f05632e8/10.1177_20552076241305284-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study of patient-physician empathy in telehealth and traditional in-person visits.远程医疗与传统面对面就诊中患者与医生同理心的比较研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Dec 12;10:20552076241305284. doi: 10.1177/20552076241305284. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Patient perception of physician empathy in stroke telemedicine.患者对卒中远程医疗中医师同理心的感知。
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Oct;27(9):572-581. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19899237. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Empathy Unmasked: Patient Perception of Physician Empathy in an Oncologic Emergency Setting. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Personal Protective Equipment Wear versus Unmasked Video Communication.揭开同理心的面纱:肿瘤急症环境中患者对医生同理心的认知。一项比较个人防护装备佩戴与未戴口罩视频通信的随机对照试验。
J Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;68:43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Retrospective study evaluating telehealth antenatal anesthesia consults for high-risk obstetric patients.回顾性研究评估远程医疗产前麻醉咨询在高危产科患者中的应用。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8836-8843. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.2005566. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
5
Young Black and White adults prefer in-person to telehealth for primary care visits and group health promotion programs.年轻的黑人和白人成年人更喜欢亲自到现场接受初级保健访问和团体健康促进计划,而不是远程医疗。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 25;14(12):738-743. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae064.
6
Effectiveness of Telehealth Versus In-Person Informed Consent: Randomized Study of Comprehension and Decision-Making.远程医疗与亲自进行知情同意的效果:关于理解与决策的随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e63473. doi: 10.2196/63473.
7
Telehealth Perceptions Among US Immigrant Patients at an Academic Internal Medicine Practice: Cross-sectional Study.美国一所学术性内科诊所中移民患者对远程医疗的看法:横断面研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Aug 10;9(3):e36069. doi: 10.2196/36069.
8
Assessing the Relationship Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Telemedicine Use Among Patients With Breast Cancer and Examining Differential Provisions of Oncology Services Between Telehealth and In-Person Visits: Quantitative Study.评估社区社会经济劣势与乳腺癌患者使用远程医疗之间的关系,并研究远程医疗与面对面就诊之间肿瘤服务的差异提供情况:定量研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Jul 18;10:e55438. doi: 10.2196/55438.
9
Physician satisfaction with telemedicine and in-person visits in otolaryngology.耳鼻喉科医生对远程医疗和面对面就诊的满意度。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Sep-Oct;43(5):103596. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103596. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Integrative Oncology Consultations Delivered via Telehealth in 2020 and In-Person in 2019: Paradigm Shift During the COVID-19 World Pandemic.2020 年通过远程医疗和 2019 年面对面进行的综合肿瘤学咨询:COVID-19 世界大流行期间的范式转变。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:1534735421999101. doi: 10.1177/1534735421999101.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing patient confidence in telehealth: Comparing across 17 medical specialties.评估患者对远程医疗的信心:对17个医学专科进行比较。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 15;11:20552076251330486. doi: 10.1177/20552076251330486. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Parent Experience with Pediatric Care Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Press Ganey Survey Scores for Telehealth and In-Person Encounters.新冠疫情期间患者及家长与儿科医疗服务提供者的经历:远程医疗与面对面诊疗的Press Ganey调查评分比较
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Jun;30(7):1825-1833. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0055. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.咨询和关系同理心(CARE)量表阿拉伯语版本的信度和效度。
Fam Pract. 2022 Nov 22;39(6):1176-1182. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac047.
3
Patient and family experience with telemedicine and in-person pediatric and obstetric ambulatory encounters throughout 2020, during the COVID-19 epidemic: the distance effect.
2020 年 COVID-19 疫情期间,患者及其家属对远程医疗以及儿科和产科门诊就诊的体验:距离效应。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 16;22(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08037-8.
4
The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future.COVID-19期间远程医疗的全球影响:当前证据及未来建议
Connect Health. 2022 Jan 4;1:7-35. doi: 10.20517/ch.2021.03.
5
A Review of the Evidence and Recommendations on Communication Skills and the Patient-Provider Relationship: A Rome Foundation Working Team Report.证据回顾与沟通技巧及医患关系的建议:罗马基金会工作组报告。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Nov;161(5):1670-1688.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.037. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Rural Telemedicine Use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Repeated Cross-sectional Study.农村远程医疗在新冠疫情前后的使用情况:一项重复横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 5;23(4):e26960. doi: 10.2196/26960.
7
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Virtual Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic and In-person Visits Pre-pandemic.新冠疫情期间虚拟就诊与疫情前门诊就诊的患者满意度比较。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2021 Jul;130(7):810-817. doi: 10.1177/0003489420977766. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Telemedicine in Middle Eastern countries: Progress, barriers, and policy recommendations.中东国家的远程医疗:进展、障碍和政策建议。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104232. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine during COVID-19.影响 COVID-19 期间远程医疗采用的因素。
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jun;64(Supplement):S234-S236. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_480_20.
10
Patient perception of physician empathy in stroke telemedicine.患者对卒中远程医疗中医师同理心的感知。
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Oct;27(9):572-581. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19899237. Epub 2020 Jan 27.