Trouvin Anne-Priscille, Simunek Arielle, Coste Joël, Medkour Terkia, Combier Alice, Poiroux Lucile, Vidal François, Carvès Sandrine, Bouhassira Didier, Perrot Serge
Le Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris Centre Cochin and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France, and Inserm U987, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin, Paris-Saclay University, AP-HP, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Le Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris Centre Cochin and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025 Jun;77(6):658-663. doi: 10.1002/art.43084. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA), managing persistent pain remains challenging. Little is known regarding impaired pain pathways in these patients and the impact of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The objective of the Rheumatism Pain Inhibitory Descending Pathways study was to assess pain thresholds and descending pain modulation in patients with active RA or SpA following introduction of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).
Patients with active disease (50 with RA and 50 with SpA) naive to bDMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs and starting a TNFi were included. Patients were observed for six months after TNFi initiation with clinical, psychological, and pain assessment. At all visits, participants underwent quantitative sensory testing with heat and cold pain thresholds and descending inhibition by conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Descending pain control (CPM effect) was assessed as the change in heat pain threshold (°C) following a conditioning stimulus.
Of the 100 patients (59 women, mean ± SD age 45.8 ± 14.6 years), 74 completed the six-month follow-up. Thermal pain thresholds did not significantly change during follow-up. CPM effect improved significantly during follow-up (mean ± SD 0.25 ±2.57°C at baseline and 2.96 ± 2.50°C at six months; P < 0.001). At the end of follow-up, the mean CPM effect was significantly higher in patients without significant pain compared with patients with persistent pain (>3 of 10 on the Brief Pain Inventory) (mean ± SD 3.25 ± 2.68°C vs 2.47 ± 2.11°C; P = 0.04) and in patients achieving remission or low disease activity compared with patients with active rheumatism (mean ± SD 3.31 ± 2.68°C vs 2.18 ± 1.87°C; P = 0.01).
In active inflammatory rheumatisms, impaired descending pain modulation, but not thermal pain thresholds, is improved after TNFi treatment, suggesting a possible effect of TNFi on central pain modulation.
在类风湿关节炎(RA)和脊柱关节炎(SpA)中,控制持续性疼痛仍然具有挑战性。对于这些患者疼痛通路受损以及生物性改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)的影响,我们了解甚少。类风湿性疼痛抑制下行通路研究的目的是评估在引入肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)后,活动性RA或SpA患者的疼痛阈值和下行性疼痛调节。
纳入初治bDMARDs或靶向合成DMARDs且开始使用TNFi的活动性疾病患者(50例RA患者和50例SpA患者)。在启动TNFi后,对患者进行为期六个月的临床、心理和疼痛评估观察。在所有就诊时,参与者接受热痛和冷痛阈值的定量感觉测试,以及通过条件性疼痛调节(CPM)进行下行抑制测试。下行性疼痛控制(CPM效应)通过条件刺激后热痛阈值(°C)的变化来评估。
100例患者(59例女性,平均±标准差年龄45.8±14.6岁)中,74例完成了六个月的随访。随访期间热痛阈值无显著变化。随访期间CPM效应显著改善(基线时平均±标准差为0.25±2.57°C,六个月时为2.96±2.50°C;P<0.001)。随访结束时,与有持续性疼痛的患者(简明疼痛量表10分中>3分)相比,无明显疼痛的患者CPM效应平均值显著更高(平均±标准差为3.25±2.68°C对2.47±2.11°C;P=0.04),与活动性风湿病患者相比,达到缓解或低疾病活动度的患者CPM效应平均值显著更高(平均±标准差为3.31±2.68°C对2.18±1.87°C;P=0.01)。
在活动性炎症性风湿病中,TNFi治疗后下行性疼痛调节受损得到改善,但热痛阈值未改善,提示TNFi对中枢性疼痛调节可能有作用。