Tukukino Carina, Parodi López Naldy, Lönnbro Johan, Wallerstedt Susanna M, Svensson Staffan A
Department of Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;81(2):301-308. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03785-4. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
To explore how hospital interns and residents specialising in family medicine act on drug interaction alerts in a specific patient case, and on interaction alerts in general.
A 4-page questionnaire, including a fictional patient case (73-year-old woman; 10 drugs in the medication list triggering 11 drug interaction alerts) and questions regarding the use of interaction alerts in general, was distributed to interns and residents during educational sessions (November‒December 2023). The respondents were instructed to consider what actions they would take "a normal day at work" due to the risk of interactions between the patients' drugs. In the general questions, the respondents were asked how often they access the detailed interaction information (from 1 = never to 5 = always) provided by the knowledge resource, in relation to the alert classification (D = clinically significant, should be avoided; C = clinically significant, can be handled by, e.g., dose adjustment).
The questionnaire was completed by 55 interns and 69 residents (response rate: 98%). In the patient case, the respondents acted on a median of 4 (range: 0‒8) drugs, most often concerning repaglinide (in a D interaction alert with clopidogrel; 96% of the interns and 96% of the residents suggested action), and omeprazole (in three C interaction alerts with citalopram, clopidogrel, and levothyroxine, respectively; 71% and 83% suggested action). Among the respondents who answered the questions about how often (rated 4/5) they access more detailed information about interactions, 56 (59%) did so for D versus 29 (31%) for C alerts (P < 0.001).
Physicians act on drug interaction alerts selectively, and the alert classifications seem to guide how they are used.
探讨医院中从事家庭医学专业的实习生和住院医师在特定患者病例中以及在一般情况下对药物相互作用警报的处理方式。
在教育课程期间(2023年11月至12月),向实习生和住院医师发放了一份4页的问卷,其中包括一个虚构的患者病例(73岁女性;用药清单中有10种药物引发了11次药物相互作用警报)以及关于一般情况下药物相互作用警报使用情况的问题。要求受访者考虑由于患者药物之间存在相互作用的风险,他们在“正常工作日”会采取什么行动。在一般问题中,询问受访者获取知识资源提供的详细相互作用信息的频率(从1 = 从不到5 = 总是),以及警报分类(D = 具有临床意义,应避免;C = 具有临床意义,可通过例如剂量调整来处理)。
55名实习生和69名住院医师完成了问卷(回复率:98%)。在患者病例中,受访者对中位数为4种(范围:0至8种)药物采取了行动,最常见的是瑞格列奈(与氯吡格雷存在D类相互作用警报;96%的实习生和96%的住院医师建议采取行动)和奥美拉唑(分别与西酞普兰、氯吡格雷和左甲状腺素存在3次C类相互作用警报;71%和83%的人建议采取行动)。在回答关于获取相互作用详细信息频率(评分为4/5)问题的受访者中,56人(59%)针对D类警报获取了详细信息,而针对C类警报的有29人(31%)(P < 0.001)。
医生对药物相互作用警报的处理具有选择性,警报分类似乎指导了它们的使用方式。