Landriel Federico, White Kevin, Padilla Lichtenberger Fernando, Guiroy Alfredo, Teles Alisson, Laos Plasier Eduardo, Buzetti Milano Jerônimo, Risso Marcelo, Astur Nelson, González Oscar, Yurac Ratko, Páez Rodolfo, Teixeira William, Toscano Maximiliano, Hem Santiago
Neurosurgical Department, Spine Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ScienceRight Research Consulting, Ontario, Canada.
World Neurosurg. 2025 Mar;195:123575. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123575. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
Combining surgery and radiotherapy is the gold standard in treating spinal metastasis when spinal stabilization or surgical decompression is required. Determining the optimal timing for radiotherapy postsurgery is crucial to balance treatment efficacy minimizing wound complications. The study aimed to identify consensus and nonconsensus areas among Latin American spinal surgeons regarding the use, timing, risks, and surgical approach to conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) following spinal surgery for metastases, specifically focusing on the risk of radiotherapy-related wound complications.
A modified Delphi survey was conducted. The expert panel included active members of AOSpine Latin America with extensive experience in vertebral metastasis surgery. The surveys include 37 statements covering areas of interest. Inter-expert consensus was considered weak (70-79.9%), moderate (80-89.9%), and strong (≥90%).
At least 70% consensus was reached on 32 of the 37 statements (86.5%). This included strong consensus on 10 statements, moderate on 13, and weaker on nine. There was high consensus on sutures and lower consensus on risk factors for cEBRT delay. Experts reached strong agreement on the importance of poor nutrition as a risk factor for cEBRT-related wound complications. Perception of wound risk was greater with a posterior midline approach compared to other approaches, and the highest perceived complication risks were for junctional locations and sacral spine.
We report strong agreements among the experts on important issues such as waiting times and risk factors for cEBRT. The findings underscore the significance of considering factors such as, spinal levels, surgical approaches, and sutures when making clinical decisions.
当需要进行脊柱稳定或手术减压时,手术与放疗相结合是治疗脊柱转移瘤的金标准。确定术后放疗的最佳时机对于平衡治疗效果和减少伤口并发症至关重要。本研究旨在确定拉丁美洲脊柱外科医生在脊柱转移瘤手术后使用传统外照射放疗(cEBRT)的时机、风险和手术方式等方面的共识和非共识领域,特别关注放疗相关伤口并发症的风险。
进行了一项改良的德尔菲调查。专家小组包括在椎体转移瘤手术方面有丰富经验的AOSpine拉丁美洲活跃成员。调查包括37项涵盖感兴趣领域的陈述。专家间的共识被认为是弱(70-79.9%)、中(80-89.9%)和强(≥90%)。
37项陈述中有32项(86.5%)达成了至少70%的共识。其中10项陈述达成了强烈共识,13项为中度共识,9项为较弱共识。在缝线方面达成了高度共识,而在cEBRT延迟的风险因素方面达成的共识较低。专家们就营养不良作为cEBRT相关伤口并发症的风险因素的重要性达成了强烈共识。与其他手术方式相比,后正中入路的伤口风险感知更高,而交界处和骶骨部位的并发症风险感知最高。
我们报告了专家们在cEBRT的等待时间和风险因素等重要问题上达成的强烈共识。研究结果强调了在临床决策时考虑脊柱节段、手术方式和缝线等因素的重要性。