Melcher Peter, Schleifenbaum Stefan, Youssef Yasmin, Rolzhäuser Philipp, Hepp Pierre, Theopold Jan
Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Helios Klinik Leisnig, Colditzer Str. 48, Leisnig, 04703, Germany.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 16;25(1):1010. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08155-w.
Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are common injuries. Reconstruction using autologous grafts is recommended to prevent further damage and functional impairment. Grafts are usually prepared with stabilizing sutures. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a 4-strand semitendinosus autograft preparation technique is non-inferior to conventional preparation techniques with regard to maximum tensile strength threshold.
Fresh porcine flexor tendons were used as specimens in this study. Four different preparation techniques for quadruple-folded tendons were compared. Group 1 three suture FiberWire® (n = 20) and Group 2 one suture FiberWire® (n = 20) using Krakow stitches, Group 3 (n = 10) using SPEEDTRAP® and piercing the autograft and 4 (n = 9) using SPEEDTRAP® without piercing the autograft for preparation. Biomechanical tensile testing included 50 sinusoidal cycles of preloading between 50 and 150 N at 1 Hz and load-to-failure was measured at 20 mm/min.
Failure at the maximum load occurred at the filament for all samples, whereas failure of the suture/tendon interface was not observed. Load-to-failure was significantly higher in Group 1 (711 ± 91 N) than in all other groups. When comparing groups 2-4 load-to-failure was significantly higher in Group 2 (347 ± 24 N) than in Group 3 (258 ± 25 N, p < 0.02) but not than in Group 4 (325 ± 26N).
In all 4 Groups the load to failure was higher than the maximum tension force on the construct that will be applied by hand (182N). Therefore, the needleless preparation technique seems to be a valuable alternative to conventional techniques for the insertion of the graft into the joint during joint-near tibial fixation technique.
前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂是常见的损伤。建议使用自体移植物进行重建以防止进一步损伤和功能障碍。移植物通常用稳定缝线制备。本研究的目的是评估四股半腱肌自体移植物制备技术在最大拉伸强度阈值方面是否不劣于传统制备技术。
本研究使用新鲜猪屈肌腱作为标本。比较了四种不同的四重折叠肌腱制备技术。第1组使用三根缝线FiberWire®(n = 20),第2组使用一根缝线FiberWire®(n = 20)并采用克拉科夫缝合法,第3组(n = 10)使用SPEEDTRAP®并穿透自体移植物,第4组(n = 9)使用SPEEDTRAP®但不穿透自体移植物进行制备。生物力学拉伸测试包括在1Hz下在50至150N之间进行50个正弦循环的预加载,并以20mm/min的速度测量至破坏载荷。
所有样本在最大载荷下均在细丝处发生断裂,而未观察到缝线/肌腱界面的断裂。第1组的至破坏载荷(711±91N)显著高于所有其他组。比较第2 - 4组时,第2组的至破坏载荷(347±24N)显著高于第3组(258±25N,p < 0.02),但不高于第4组(325±26N)。
在所有4组中,至破坏载荷均高于手工施加在构建物上的最大张力(182N)。因此,在关节附近胫骨固定技术中,无针制备技术似乎是将移植物插入关节的传统技术的一种有价值的替代方法。