Cartwright R Y, Davies J R, Dulake C, Hart R J, Morris C A, Wilkinson P J
J Clin Pathol. 1985 Feb;38(2):208-14. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.2.208.
A study of a modified Canadian unit system of measuring laboratory workload was undertaken in five joint Public Health Laboratory Service and hospital microbiology laboratories. Ten percent of the specimens received over six months were sampled, the number of units expended on each was recorded, and the results were analysed on a central computer. The process of gathering information in the absence of laboratory computers was time consuming and, despite careful planning, differences were found in the recording practices of the laboratories. The analysis of results did not lead to major changes in data gathering techniques because the same information about laboratory workload could be obtained by collecting numbers of clearly defined specimens. Analysis of workload units could be useful for particular purposes, such as comparing differences between laboratories using different techniques for the same investigation or assessing the possible benefits of automation. It must be appreciated, however, that workload units are measures of quantity not of laboratory performance.
在五个公共卫生实验室服务机构与医院微生物实验室联合开展了一项关于改良的加拿大实验室工作量测量单位系统的研究。对六个月以上接收的标本抽取10%进行采样,记录处理每个标本所耗费的单位数量,并在中央计算机上对结果进行分析。在没有实验室计算机的情况下收集信息的过程耗时费力,而且尽管进行了精心规划,但各实验室的记录方式仍存在差异。结果分析并未导致数据收集技术发生重大变化,因为通过收集明确界定的标本数量可获取有关实验室工作量的相同信息。工作量单位分析对于特定目的可能有用,比如比较同一调查中使用不同技术的实验室之间的差异,或评估自动化可能带来的益处。然而,必须认识到,工作量单位是数量的度量,而非实验室绩效的度量。