Chapman Meredith, Fenner Kate, Thomas Matthew J W, Thompson Kirrilly
School of Health, Medical and Applied Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4701, Australia.
School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;14(23):3450. doi: 10.3390/ani14233450.
With the growth of the equestrian industry, risk exposure and the obligation to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of humans and horses remain front and centre. As there has been no apparent reduction in non-fatal human horse-related injuries, we asked industry stakeholders to discuss their current management and risk mitigation practices and highlight potential barriers to improving these processes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 stakeholders from Australian equestrian work- ( = 9) and non-work- ( = 11) related organisations to determine the potential benefits and feasibility of adopting an industry-specific health, safety, and welfare (HSW) management system. The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management framework, often used by high-risk industries, guided deductive data coding. Most participants preferred formal HSW management systems and supported improvements in their current HSW practices. Industry gaps included (1) lack of training, education material, and competency; (2) social licence to operate (SLO) regarding horse welfare; and (3) management of and resistance to change. Industry barriers included (1) lack of good governance and (2) poor safety culture related to tradition and human behaviours. Most stakeholders sought further collaboration, HSW guidance materials, and national industry representation opportunities, with supporting the concept of an adaptable industry-specific HSW management system. Further multi-sector equestrian stakeholder engagement is recommended to determine the feasibility of adopting and modifying (ISO) 45001:2018 as a suitable equestrian industry-specific HSW management system.
随着马术行业的发展,风险暴露以及维护人类和马匹健康、安全与福利的责任仍然是首要关注点。由于与马匹相关的非致命人类伤害并未明显减少,我们邀请行业利益相关者讨论他们当前的管理和风险缓解措施,并指出改进这些流程的潜在障碍。我们对来自澳大利亚马术工作相关组织(9个)和非工作相关组织(11个)的20名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,以确定采用特定行业健康、安全与福利(HSW)管理体系的潜在益处和可行性。国际标准化组织(ISO)45001:2018职业健康与安全管理框架常用于高风险行业,为演绎数据编码提供了指导。大多数参与者倾向于正式的HSW管理体系,并支持改进他们当前的HSW实践。行业差距包括:(1)缺乏培训、教育材料和能力;(2)关于马匹福利的运营社会许可(SLO);以及(3)变革的管理和阻力。行业障碍包括:(1)缺乏良好治理;以及(2)与传统和人类行为相关的不良安全文化。大多数利益相关者寻求进一步的合作、HSW指导材料和国家行业代表机会,并支持建立一个适应性强的特定行业HSW管理体系的理念。建议进一步开展多部门马术利益相关者参与活动,以确定采用和修改(ISO)45001:2018作为适合马术行业的特定HSW管理体系的可行性。