Huang Ching-Ya, Wu Shao-Chun, Lin Tsan-Shiun, Kuo Pao-Jen, Yang Johnson Chia-Shen, Hsu Shiun-Yuan, Hsieh Ching-Hua
Department of Plastic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;14(23):2735. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232735.
Trauma has a profound impact on mortality as well as short- and long-term health outcomes. For trauma patients to receive medical care in a timely manner, early identification and risk assessment are essential. The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS), which was created by combining age, the Injury Severity Score (ISS), and the requirement for packed red blood cell transfusion, has proven to be a valuable prognostic tool for elderly trauma patients, though its applicability to general trauma patients is still understudied.
This retrospective study analyzed data from the Trauma Registry System at a Level I trauma center in southern Taiwan, covering the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2021. This study included 40,068 trauma patients aged 20 years and older. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate analyses to identify independent risk factors for mortality. The predictive performance of the GTOS was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.
The final study population included 40,068 patients, with 818 deaths and 39,250 survivors. Deceased patients had higher GTOS scores (mean 132.8 vs. 76.1, < 0.001) and required more blood transfusions (mean 4.0 vs. 0.3 units, < 0.001) compared to survivors. The optimal GTOS cut-off value for predicting mortality was 104.5, with a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 84.3% (AUC = 0.917). A high GTOS score was associated with increased mortality (9.6 vs. 0.4%, < 0.001) compared with a low GTOS score, even after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted mortality rate of 2.86, < 0.001), and a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 7.7 days, < 0.001).
The GTOS is a valuable prognostic tool for predicting mortality in trauma patients, providing a simple and rapid assessment method. Its high predictive accuracy supports its use in broader trauma patient populations beyond the elderly. Further studies are recommended to refine and validate the GTOS in diverse trauma settings to enhance its clinical utility.
创伤对死亡率以及短期和长期健康结果都有深远影响。为使创伤患者及时获得医疗救治,早期识别和风险评估至关重要。老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)由年龄、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和浓缩红细胞输注需求组合而成,已被证明是老年创伤患者的一种有价值的预后工具,不过其在一般创伤患者中的适用性仍有待研究。
这项回顾性研究分析了台湾南部一家一级创伤中心创伤登记系统在2009年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间的数据。该研究纳入了40,068名年龄在20岁及以上的创伤患者。统计分析包括卡方检验、方差分析、曼 - 惠特尼U检验和多变量分析,以确定死亡的独立危险因素。使用受试者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)评估GTOS的预测性能。
最终研究人群包括40,068名患者,其中818人死亡,39,250人存活。与存活患者相比,死亡患者的GTOS评分更高(平均132.8对76.1,<0.001),且需要更多输血(平均4.0对0.3单位,<0.001)。预测死亡率的最佳GTOS临界值为104.5,敏感性为82.6%,特异性为84.3%(AUC = 0.917)。即使在调整混杂因素后(调整后的死亡率为2.86,<0.001),与低GTOS评分相比,高GTOS评分与死亡率增加相关(9.6%对0.4%,<0.001),且住院时间更长(14.0天对7.7天,<0.001)。
GTOS是预测创伤患者死亡率的一种有价值的预后工具,提供了一种简单快速的评估方法。其高预测准确性支持其在老年以外更广泛的创伤患者群体中使用。建议进一步研究以在不同创伤环境中完善和验证GTOS,以提高其临床实用性。