• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年创伤患者的 1 年死亡率:利用社会保障死亡索引改进老年创伤结局评分。

One-year mortality in geriatric trauma patients: Improving upon the geriatric trauma outcomes score utilizing the social security death index.

机构信息

From the Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (S.W.R.), Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; Division of General and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (F.M.A., M.Z., A.T.M., M.W.C., H.A.P.), and Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery (M.R.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Nov;87(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002441.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002441
PMID:31318764
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geriatric Trauma Outcomes Score (GTOS) predicts in-patient mortality in geriatric trauma patients and has been validated in a prospective multicenter trial and expanded to predict adverse discharge (GTOS II). We hypothesized that these formulations actually underestimate the downstream sequelae of injury and sought to predict longer-term mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

The Parkland Memorial Hospital Trauma registry was queried for patients 65 years or older from 2001 to 2013. Patients were then matched to the Social Security Death Index. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. The original GTOS formula (variables of age, Injury Severity Score [ISS], 24-hour transfusion) was tested to predict 1-year mortality using receiver operator curves. Significant variables on univariate analysis were used to build an optimal multivariate model to predict 1-year mortality (GTOS III).

RESULTS

There were 3,262 patients who met inclusion. Inpatient mortality was 10.0% (324) and increased each year: 15.8%, 1 year; 17.8%, 2 years; and 22.6%, 5 years. The original GTOS equation had an area under the curve of 0.742 for 1-year mortality. Univariate analysis showed that patients with 1-year mortality had on average increased age (75.7 years vs. 79.5 years), ISS (11.1 vs. 19.1), lower GCS score (14.3 vs. 10.5), more likely to require transfusion within 24 hours (11.5% vs. 31.3%), and adverse discharge (19.5% vs. 78.2%; p < 0.0001 for all). Multivariate logistic regression was used to create the optimal equation to predict 1-year mortality: (GTOSIII = age + [0.806 × ISS] + 5.55 [if transfusion in first 24 hours] + 21.69 [if low GCS] + 34.36 [if adverse discharge]); area under the curve of 0.878.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic injury in geriatric patients is associated with high mortality rates at 1 year to 5 years. GTOS III has robust test characteristics to predict death at 1 year and can be used to guide patient centered goals discussions with objective data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

摘要

背景

老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)可预测老年创伤患者的住院死亡率,并已在一项前瞻性多中心试验中得到验证,并扩展用于预测不良出院(GTOS II)。我们假设这些公式实际上低估了损伤的后续后果,并试图预测老年创伤患者的长期死亡率。

方法

从 2001 年至 2013 年,在 Parkland Memorial Hospital 创伤登记处查询 65 岁或以上的患者。然后,患者与社会保障死亡指数相匹配。主要结局是 1 年死亡率。使用接收者操作曲线测试原始 GTOS 公式(年龄、损伤严重程度评分 [ISS]、24 小时输血变量)来预测 1 年死亡率。单因素分析中的显著变量用于构建预测 1 年死亡率的最佳多变量模型(GTOS III)。

结果

共有 3262 名患者符合纳入标准。住院死亡率为 10.0%(324 人),且每年递增:1 年为 15.8%;2 年为 17.8%;5 年为 22.6%。原始 GTOS 方程对 1 年死亡率的曲线下面积为 0.742。单因素分析显示,1 年死亡率患者的平均年龄较高(75.7 岁比 79.5 岁)、ISS(11.1 比 19.1)、较低的 GCS 评分(14.3 比 10.5)、24 小时内更有可能需要输血(11.5%比 31.3%)以及不良出院(19.5%比 78.2%;所有比较均 p <0.0001)。多变量逻辑回归用于创建预测 1 年死亡率的最佳方程:(GTOSIII=年龄+[0.806×ISS]+5.55[如果在头 24 小时内输血]+21.69[如果 GCS 较低]+34.36[如果不良出院]);曲线下面积为 0.878。

结论

老年患者创伤后 1 年至 5 年死亡率较高。GTOS III 具有可靠的测试特征,可用于预测 1 年死亡,并可使用客观数据指导以患者为中心的目标讨论。

证据水平

预后,III 级。

相似文献

1
One-year mortality in geriatric trauma patients: Improving upon the geriatric trauma outcomes score utilizing the social security death index.老年创伤患者的 1 年死亡率:利用社会保障死亡索引改进老年创伤结局评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Nov;87(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002441.
2
Multicenter external validation of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: A study by the Prognostic Assessment of Life and Limitations After Trauma in the Elderly (PALLIATE) consortium.老年创伤结局评分的多中心外部验证:老年创伤后生活与局限性预后评估(PALLIATE)联盟的一项研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):204-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000926.
3
Predicting In-Hospital and 1-Year Mortality in Geriatric Trauma Patients Using Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.使用老年创伤结局评分预测老年创伤患者的院内及1年死亡率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
Validation of a Geriatric Trauma Prognosis Calculator: A P.A.L.Li.A.T.E. Consortium Study.老年创伤预后计算器的验证:一项P.A.L.Li.A.T.E.联盟研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Oct;65(10):2302-2307. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15009. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
5
A comparison of prognosis calculators for geriatric trauma: A Prognostic Assessment of Life and Limitations After Trauma in the Elderly consortium study.老年创伤预后计算器的比较:老年创伤后生活与局限性的预后评估联盟研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):90-96. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001506.
6
Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients.老年创伤患者的发病率和死亡率。
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):702-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00024.
7
Estimating Geriatric Mortality after Injury Using Age, Injury Severity, and Performance of a Transfusion: The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score.利用年龄、损伤严重程度和输血情况评估老年创伤后的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):677-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0027. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Validation of the geriatric trauma outcome scores in predicting outcomes of elderly trauma patients.验证老年创伤结局评分在预测老年创伤患者结局中的作用。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.056. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Predicting Mortality of Korean Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Comparison between Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score and Trauma and Injury Severity Score.预测韩国老年创伤患者的死亡率:老年创伤结局评分与创伤和损伤严重程度评分的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):88-94. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.88.
10
Performance of trauma scoring systems in predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients: comparison of the ISS, TRISS, and GTOS based on a systemic review and meta-analysis.创伤评分系统在预测老年创伤患者死亡率中的性能:基于系统评价和荟萃分析比较 ISS、TRISS 和 GTOS。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1453-1465. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02467-1. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) in Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.老年创伤结局评分(GTOS)对创伤患者死亡率的预测效能:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 5;14(23):2735. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14232735.
2
Factors related to early and rapid assessment of in-hospital mortality among older adult trauma patients in an earthquake.地震中老年创伤患者院内死亡早期快速评估的相关因素
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(6):425-432. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.099.
3
The statistical importance of P-POSSUM scores for predicting mortality after emergency laparotomy in geriatric patients.
老年患者急诊剖腹手术后,P-POSSUM 评分预测死亡率的统计学意义。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 May 7;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1100-9.