• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同芯材复合夹层结构冲击响应的试验与数值研究

Experimental and Numerical Study on the Impact Response of Composite Sandwich Structures with Different Cores.

作者信息

Feng Guangshuo, Xiao Chunlu, Liu Bo, Zhang Haitao, Jia Peipei, Wang Caizheng

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

ShenSi Lab, Shenzhen Institute for Advanced Study, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518110, China.

出版信息

Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 7;16(23):3436. doi: 10.3390/polym16233436.

DOI:10.3390/polym16233436
PMID:39684181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11644206/
Abstract

This study analyzes the impact mechanical response of sandwich structures with foam and wood cores through experimental and numerical methods. The aim is to determine whether a sustainable core material, such as cork wood, can serve as a reliable alternative to the commonly used Polystyrene (PS) foam core in sandwich structures. Impact experiments were conducted at varying energy levels using an INSTRON CEAST 9350 drop tower, demonstrating the superiority of sandwich structures compared to single-material alternatives. Numerical models were developed in ABAQUS, where glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite panels were represented using solid element C3D8R and the 3D Hashin failure criteria, which were incorporated via the user subroutine VUMAT. The results indicate that the contact force of the sandwich structure with a wood core surpassed that of the foam core counterpart. In both sandwich structures, damage initially occurred at the impact point on the surface, leading to plastic deformation and damage within the core, while the composite panel on the rear surface ultimately failed. These findings provide valuable insights for designers, enabling parametric studies to select appropriate core materials that enhance the impact resistance of sandwich structures.

摘要

本研究通过实验和数值方法分析了带有泡沫和木质芯材的夹层结构的冲击力学响应。目的是确定一种可持续的芯材,如软木,是否可以作为夹层结构中常用的聚苯乙烯(PS)泡沫芯材的可靠替代品。使用英斯特朗CEAST 9350落锤塔在不同能量水平下进行了冲击实验,证明了夹层结构相对于单一材料替代品的优越性。在ABAQUS中开发了数值模型,其中玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)复合面板使用实体单元C3D8R和3D哈希因失效准则表示,并通过用户子程序VUMAT纳入。结果表明,带有木质芯材的夹层结构的接触力超过了带有泡沫芯材的对应结构。在两种夹层结构中,损伤最初都发生在表面的冲击点处,导致芯材内部的塑性变形和损伤,而后表面的复合面板最终失效。这些发现为设计师提供了有价值的见解,使他们能够进行参数研究以选择合适的芯材,从而提高夹层结构的抗冲击性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/f2e77342f34b/polymers-16-03436-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/2b24bb662146/polymers-16-03436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/5c4a73e73a29/polymers-16-03436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/1fc0fc6af962/polymers-16-03436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/1cf3ddc6aee7/polymers-16-03436-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/d03e149f5f6d/polymers-16-03436-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/e405c871b16c/polymers-16-03436-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/f4945ad2a73d/polymers-16-03436-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/aa6d3b46a3bc/polymers-16-03436-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/0ca4919bb020/polymers-16-03436-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/4f22666a69b7/polymers-16-03436-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/8f9885e261fc/polymers-16-03436-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/942408fe9c0d/polymers-16-03436-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/ac58bb176efd/polymers-16-03436-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/dbeda5d61aa2/polymers-16-03436-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/8160124b54ea/polymers-16-03436-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/f2e77342f34b/polymers-16-03436-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/2b24bb662146/polymers-16-03436-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/5c4a73e73a29/polymers-16-03436-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/1fc0fc6af962/polymers-16-03436-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/1cf3ddc6aee7/polymers-16-03436-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/d03e149f5f6d/polymers-16-03436-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/e405c871b16c/polymers-16-03436-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/f4945ad2a73d/polymers-16-03436-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/aa6d3b46a3bc/polymers-16-03436-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/0ca4919bb020/polymers-16-03436-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/4f22666a69b7/polymers-16-03436-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/8f9885e261fc/polymers-16-03436-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/942408fe9c0d/polymers-16-03436-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/ac58bb176efd/polymers-16-03436-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/dbeda5d61aa2/polymers-16-03436-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/8160124b54ea/polymers-16-03436-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4e/11644206/f2e77342f34b/polymers-16-03436-g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental and Numerical Study on the Impact Response of Composite Sandwich Structures with Different Cores.不同芯材复合夹层结构冲击响应的试验与数值研究
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 7;16(23):3436. doi: 10.3390/polym16233436.
2
Numerical Analysis of the Impact Resistance of Composite A-Shaped Sandwich Structures.复合 A 形夹层结构抗冲击性的数值分析
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;16(14):5031. doi: 10.3390/ma16145031.
3
Study on Flexural Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Sandwich Composites Using Liquid Thermoplastic Resin.使用液态热塑性树脂的玻璃纤维增强塑料夹层复合材料的弯曲行为研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;14(19):4045. doi: 10.3390/polym14194045.
4
Numerical Studies on Failure Mechanisms of All-Composite Sandwich Structure with Honeycomb Core under Compression and Impact Loading Conditions.蜂窝芯全复合材料夹层结构在压缩和冲击载荷条件下失效机理的数值研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;14(19):4047. doi: 10.3390/polym14194047.
5
Mechanical Behaviour of Pin-Reinforced Foam Core Sandwich Panels Subjected to Low Impact Loading.销钉增强泡沫芯夹芯板在低冲击载荷作用下的力学行为。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 21;13(21):3627. doi: 10.3390/polym13213627.
6
Optimal sandwich panel's core design for an enhanced impact resistance.用于增强抗冲击性的最佳夹芯板芯部设计。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 18;11(1):e41211. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41211. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
7
Numerical Study of Low-Velocity Impact Response of a Fiber Composite Honeycomb Sandwich Structure.纤维复合蜂窝夹层结构低速冲击响应的数值研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;16(15):5482. doi: 10.3390/ma16155482.
8
Experimental and Numerical Study on Dynamic Response of Foam-Nickel Sandwich Panels under Near-Field Blast Loading.泡沫镍夹芯板在近场爆炸载荷作用下动态响应的试验与数值研究
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;16(16):5640. doi: 10.3390/ma16165640.
9
Mechanical Behavior of Bio-Inspired Honeycomb-Core Composite Sandwich Structures to Low-Velocity Dynamic Loading.仿生蜂窝芯复合夹层结构对低速动态载荷的力学行为
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 4;17(5):1191. doi: 10.3390/ma17051191.
10
Plastic Forming of Sandwich Panels and Numerical Analyses of the Forming Processes Based on Elastoplastic Equivalent Model.基于弹塑性等效模型的夹芯板塑性成型及成型过程数值分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;14(17):4955. doi: 10.3390/ma14174955.

本文引用的文献

1
Cork Façades as an Innovative and Sustainable Approach in Architecture: A Review of Cork Materials, Properties and Case Studies.软木外墙:建筑领域的创新与可持续方法——软木材料、特性及案例研究综述
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;17(17):4414. doi: 10.3390/ma17174414.