• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康干预措施对提高非正式照料者健康素养的有效性:一项系统文献综述方案

The Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Promoting the Health Literacy of Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol.

作者信息

Valentim Patrícia, Costa Paulo, Henriques Adriana, Nogueira Paulo, Costa Andreia

机构信息

Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.

Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Ed. Egas Moniz, Piso 0, Ala C, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;12(23):2354. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232354.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12232354
PMID:39684976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641513/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) offer significant opportunities to enhance public health, particularly through their strategic use in promoting health literacy.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review protocol aims to outline the methodological steps necessary to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of digital interventions in improving health literacy among informal caregivers.

METHODS

This review will include studies involving adult informal caregivers (≥18 years) undergoing a digital health intervention promoting health literacy. Intervention, effectiveness or efficacy, RCT, quasi-experimental, and observational studies will be eligible. This review will follow the methodology for Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The search strategy will identify studies published in the databases SCOPUS and Web of Science, as well as CINAHL (via EBSCO) and PubMed and gray literature sources. Two in-dependent reviewers will screen the studies, extract data, and critically appraise the selected studies. It is planned that the risk of bias will be assessed using the RoB2, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions). From the included studies, data will be extracted on the identification of the study, the aim of the study, characteristics of the population, study method and intervention and control conditions, study variables, and significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated that the results of the study will guide healthcare professionals and managers in incorporating digital technologies into health literacy programs for informal caregivers. Whenever possible, a statistical meta-analysis will be performed to combine study results. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42024589465.

摘要

背景

数字信息与通信技术(ICTs)为促进公众健康提供了重大机遇,特别是通过其在提高健康素养方面的战略应用。

目的

本系统评价方案旨在概述对数字干预措施提高非正式照料者健康素养有效性进行系统评价所需的方法步骤。

方法

本评价将纳入涉及接受促进健康素养的数字健康干预的成年非正式照料者(≥18岁)的研究。干预、有效性或疗效、随机对照试验、准实验和观察性研究均符合条件。本评价将遵循Cochrane系统评价和Meta分析的方法。检索策略将识别在SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库以及CINAHL(通过EBSCO)、PubMed和灰色文献来源中发表的研究。两名独立评审员将筛选研究、提取数据并严格评估所选研究。计划使用RoB2、纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)和ROBINS-I(干预非随机研究中的偏倚风险)评估偏倚风险。从纳入的研究中,将提取有关研究识别、研究目的、人群特征、研究方法以及干预和对照条件、研究变量和显著结果的数据。

结论

预计该研究结果将指导医疗保健专业人员和管理人员将数字技术纳入针对非正式照料者的健康素养计划。只要有可能,将进行统计Meta分析以合并研究结果。PROSPERO注册号为CRD42024589465。

相似文献

1
The Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Promoting the Health Literacy of Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Literature Review Protocol.电子健康干预措施对提高非正式照料者健康素养的有效性:一项系统文献综述方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;12(23):2354. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232354.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Forced Migrant Populations: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.改善被迫迁移人口数字健康素养的干预措施的有效性:一项混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 2;12:e50798. doi: 10.2196/50798.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
6
eHealth literacy measurement tools: a systematic review protocol.电子健康素养测评工具:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 24;11(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02076-2.
7
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.
8
Digital Health Interventions for Informal Family Caregivers of People With First-Episode Psychosis: Systematic Review on User Experience and Effectiveness.数字健康干预措施对首发精神病患者非正规家庭照顾者的影响:用户体验和有效性的系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 28;11:e63743. doi: 10.2196/63743.
9
Applying dyadic digital psychological interventions for reducing caregiver burden in the illness context: a systematic review and a meta-analysis protocol.应用对偶数字心理干预减轻疾病背景下照顾者负担的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e070279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070279.
10
Psychological interventions for depression among informal caregivers of older adult populations: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.针对老年人群体非正式照护者抑郁的心理干预措施:系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e036402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036402.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of e-Health Literacy on Risk Perception Among University Students.电子健康素养对大学生风险认知的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;13(3):265. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030265.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Digital Technologies in the Promotion of Health Literacy and Empowerment of Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.数字技术在促进健康素养和赋权非正式照护者中的应用:范围综述。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 29;7:e54913. doi: 10.2196/54913.
2
Determinants and outcomes of eHealth literacy in healthy adults: A systematic review.健康成年人电子健康素养的决定因素和结果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291229. eCollection 2023.
3
Effectiveness of Digital Health Literacy Interventions in Older Adults: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.数字健康素养干预对老年人的有效性:单臂荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 28;25:e48166. doi: 10.2196/48166.
4
Digital health interventions to support family caregivers: An updated systematic review.支持家庭护理人员的数字健康干预措施:一项更新的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2023 May 19;9:20552076231171967. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171967. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Health Literacy among Older Adults in Portugal and Associated Sociodemographic, Health and Healthcare-Related Factors.葡萄牙老年人的健康素养及其相关的社会人口学、健康和医疗保健相关因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 25;20(5):4172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054172.
6
Digital Health Technology to Support Health Care Professionals and Family Caregivers Caring for Patients With Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review.支持医疗保健专业人员和家庭护理人员照料认知障碍患者的数字健康技术:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jan 11;10:e40330. doi: 10.2196/40330.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Is health literacy of family carers associated with carer burden, quality of life, and time spent on informal care for older persons living with dementia?家庭护理者的健康素养是否与照顾者负担、生活质量以及为痴呆症老年患者提供非正式护理所花费的时间有关?
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241982. eCollection 2020.
9
Internet-Based Supportive Interventions for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于互联网的支持性干预措施对痴呆患者家属的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 9;22(9):e19468. doi: 10.2196/19468.
10
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.电子检索策略的PRESS同行评审:2015年指南声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 19.