Suppr超能文献

结肠胶囊内镜中的息肉匹配:开创CCE与结肠镜检查的整合,迈向人工智能驱动的未来。

Polyp Matching in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Pioneering CCE-Colonoscopy Integration Towards an AI-Driven Future.

作者信息

Lei Ian Io, Arasaradnam Ramesh, Koulaouzidis Anastasios

机构信息

Institute of Precision Diagnostics & Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 21;13(23):7034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237034.

Abstract

: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is becoming more widely available across Europe, but its uptake is slow due to the need for follow-up colonoscopy for therapeutic procedures and biopsies, which impacts its cost-effectiveness. One of the major factors driving the conversion to colonoscopy is the detection of excess polyps in CCE that cannot be matched during subsequent colonoscopy. The capsule's rocking motion, which can lead to duplicate reporting of the same polyp when viewed from different angles, is likely a key contributor. : This review aims to explore the types of polyp matching reported in the literature, assess matching techniques and matching accuracy, and evaluate the development of machine learning models to improve polyp matching in CCE and subsequent colonoscopy. : A systematic literature search was conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed. Due to the scarcity of research in this area, the search encompassed clinical trials, observational studies, reviews, case series, and editorial letters. Three directly related studies were included, and ten indirectly related studies were included for review. : Polyp matching in colon capsule endoscopy still needs to be developed, with only one study focused on creating criteria to match polyps within the same CCE video. Another study established that experienced CCE readers have greater accuracy, reducing interobserver variability. A machine learning algorithm was developed in one study to match polyps between initial CCE and subsequent colonoscopy. Only around 50% of polyps were successfully matched, requiring further optimisation. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms advance in CCE polyp detection, the risk of duplicate reporting may increase when clinicians are presented with polyp images or timestamps, potentially complicating the transition to AI-assisted CCE reading in the future. : Polyp matching in CCE is a developing field with considerable challenges, especially in matching polyps within the same video. Although AI shows potential for decent accuracy, more research is needed to refine these techniques and make CCE a more reliable, non-invasive alternative to complement conventional colonoscopy for lower GI investigations.

摘要

结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)在欧洲的普及程度越来越高,但由于治疗程序和活检需要后续结肠镜检查,其应用进展缓慢,这影响了其成本效益。促使转为结肠镜检查的主要因素之一是在CCE中检测到的多余息肉在后续结肠镜检查中无法匹配。胶囊的摇摆运动可能是一个关键因素,从不同角度观察时,它可能导致对同一息肉的重复报告。

本综述旨在探讨文献中报道的息肉匹配类型,评估匹配技术和匹配准确性,并评估机器学习模型的发展,以改善CCE和后续结肠镜检查中的息肉匹配。

在EMBASE、MEDLINE和PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索。由于该领域的研究较少,检索范围包括临床试验、观察性研究、综述、病例系列和编辑信件。纳入了三项直接相关的研究,并纳入了十项间接相关的研究进行综述。

结肠胶囊内镜检查中的息肉匹配仍有待发展,只有一项研究专注于制定同一CCE视频内息肉匹配的标准。另一项研究表明,有经验的CCE阅片者准确性更高,减少了观察者间的变异性。一项研究开发了一种机器学习算法,用于在初始CCE和后续结肠镜检查之间匹配息肉。只有约50%的息肉成功匹配,需要进一步优化。随着人工智能(AI)算法在CCE息肉检测中的进展,当临床医生看到息肉图像或时间戳时,重复报告的风险可能会增加,这可能会使未来向AI辅助CCE阅片的过渡变得复杂。

CCE中的息肉匹配是一个具有相当挑战性的发展领域,特别是在同一视频内的息肉匹配方面。尽管AI显示出有一定准确性的潜力,但仍需要更多研究来完善这些技术,使CCE成为一种更可靠的、非侵入性的替代方法,以补充传统结肠镜检查用于下消化道检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8f8/11642282/fc05bf7b16f9/jcm-13-07034-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验