Lei Ian Io, Thorndal Camilla, Manzoor Muhammad Shoaib, Parsons Nicholas, Noble Charlie, Huhulea Cristiana, Koulaouzidis Anastasios, Arasaradnam Ramesh P
Institute of Precision Diagnostics & Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(18):2056. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182056.
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) has regained popularity for lower gastrointestinal investigations since the COVID-19 pandemic. While there have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses on colonic polyp detection using CCE, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence concerning colonic inflammation. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CCE for colonic inflammation, predominantly ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We systematically searched electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Cochrane Library) for studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy between CCE and optical endoscopy as the standard reference. A bivariate random effect model was used for the meta-analysis. From 3797 publications, 23 studies involving 1353 patients were included. Nine studies focused on UC, and ten focused on CD. For UC, CCE showed a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 88-95%), a specificity of 71% (95% CI, 35-92%), and an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97). For CD, the pooled sensitivity was 92% (95% CI, 89-95%), and the specificity was 88% (95% CI, 84-92%), with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.98). Overall, for inflammatory bowel disease, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90% (95% CI, 85-93%), 76% (95% CI, 56-90%), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), respectively. Despite the challenges around standardised disease scoring and the lack of histological confirmation, CCE performs well in diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease. It demonstrates high sensitivity in both UC and Crohn's terminal ileitis and colitis and high specificity in Crohn's disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of other colonic inflammatory conditions.
自新冠疫情以来,结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)在 lower gastrointestinal investigations 中再度受到欢迎。虽然已有关于使用CCE检测结肠息肉的系统评价和荟萃分析,但缺乏关于结肠炎症的全面证据。因此,本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估CCE对结肠炎症(主要是溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD))的诊断准确性。我们系统检索了电子数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed Central和Cochrane图书馆),以查找比较CCE与作为标准参考的光学内镜检查诊断准确性的研究。荟萃分析采用双变量随机效应模型。从3797篇出版物中,纳入了23项涉及1353例患者的研究。9项研究聚焦于UC,10项聚焦于CD。对于UC,CCE的合并敏感度为92%(95%CI,88-95%),特异度为71%(95%CI,35-92%),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.93(95%CI,0.89-0.97)。对于CD,合并敏感度为92%(95%CI,89-95%),特异度为88%(95%CI,84-92%),AUC为0.87(95%CI,0.76-0.98)。总体而言,对于炎症性肠病,合并敏感度特异度和AUC分别为90%(95%CI,85-93%)、76%(95%CI,56-90%)和0.92(95%CI,0.94-0.97)。尽管在标准化疾病评分方面存在挑战且缺乏组织学确认,但CCE在诊断炎症性肠病方面表现良好。它在UC和克罗恩末端回肠炎及结肠炎中均显示出高敏感度,在克罗恩病中显示出高特异度。需要进一步研究来评估其他结肠炎症性疾病的诊断准确性。