• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性化预测神经重症监护病房中高阿片类药物使用情况:针对中风或创伤性脑损伤所致急性脑损伤的分层风险模型的开发与验证

Personalizing Prediction of High Opioid Use in the Neurointensive Care Unit: Development and Validation of a Stratified Risk Model for Acute Brain Injury Due to Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Wang Wei Yun, Holland Ian C, Fong Christine T, Blacker Samuel N, Lele Abhijit V

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 22;13(23):7055. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237055.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13237055
PMID:39685513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11642241/
Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a stratified risk model for predicting high opioid use in patients with acute brain injury due to stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to a neurocritical care intensive care unit. : We examined the factors associated with the use of high-opioids (≥75th quartile, ≥17.5 oral morphine equivalent/ICU day) in a retrospective cohort study including patients with acute ischemic stroke, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, and TBI. We then developed, trained, and validated a risk model to predict high-dose opioids. : Among 2490 patients aged 45-64 years ( = -0.25), aged 65-80 years ( = -0.97), and aged ≥80 years ( = -1.17), a history of anxiety/depression ( = 0.57), a history of illicit drug use ( = 0.79), admission diagnosis ( = 1.21), lowest Glasgow Coma Scale Score (GCSL) [GCSL 3-8 ( = -0.90], {GCS L 9-12 (( = -0.34)], mechanical ventilation ( = 1.21), intracranial pressure monitoring ( = 0.69), craniotomy/craniectomy ( = 0.6), and paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity ( = 1.12) were found to be significant predictors of high-dose opioid use. When validated, the model demonstrated an area under the curve ranging from 0.72 to 0.82, accuracy ranging from 0.68 to 0.91, precision ranging from 0.71 to 0.94, recall ranging from 0.75 to 1, and F1 ranging from 0.74 to 0.95. : A personalized stratified risk model may allow clinicians to predict the risk of high opioid use in patients with acute brain injury due to stroke or TBI. Findings need validation in multi-center cohorts.

摘要

本研究旨在开发并验证一种分层风险模型,用于预测入住神经重症监护病房的因中风或创伤性脑损伤(TBI)导致急性脑损伤患者的高阿片类药物使用情况。:在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们检查了与高剂量阿片类药物使用(≥第75四分位数,≥17.5口服吗啡当量/重症监护病房日)相关的因素,该研究纳入了急性缺血性中风、自发性脑出血、自发性蛛网膜下腔出血和TBI患者。然后,我们开发、训练并验证了一个预测高剂量阿片类药物的风险模型。:在2490名年龄在45 - 64岁(=-0.25)、65 - 80岁(=-0.97)和≥80岁(=-1.17)的患者中,焦虑/抑郁病史(=0.57)、非法药物使用史(=0.79)、入院诊断(=1.21)、最低格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(GCSL)[GCSL 3 - 8(=-0.90)]、{GCS L 9 - 12((=-0.34)]、机械通气(=1.21)、颅内压监测(=0.69)、开颅手术/颅骨切除术(=0.6)和阵发性交感神经过度兴奋(=1.12)被发现是高剂量阿片类药物使用的显著预测因素。经验证,该模型的曲线下面积范围为0.72至0.82,准确率范围为0.68至0.91,精确率范围为0.71至0.94,召回率范围为0.75至1,F1范围为0.74至0.95。:个性化分层风险模型可能使临床医生能够预测因中风或TBI导致急性脑损伤患者高阿片类药物使用的风险。研究结果需要在多中心队列中进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e0/11642241/cd71f00eaa28/jcm-13-07055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e0/11642241/cd71f00eaa28/jcm-13-07055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e0/11642241/cd71f00eaa28/jcm-13-07055-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personalizing Prediction of High Opioid Use in the Neurointensive Care Unit: Development and Validation of a Stratified Risk Model for Acute Brain Injury Due to Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury.个性化预测神经重症监护病房中高阿片类药物使用情况:针对中风或创伤性脑损伤所致急性脑损伤的分层风险模型的开发与验证
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 22;13(23):7055. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237055.
2
Early Cardiac Evaluation, Abnormal Test Results, and Associations with Outcomes in Patients with Acute Brain Injury Admitted to a Neurocritical Care Unit.入住神经重症监护病房的急性脑损伤患者的早期心脏评估、异常检查结果及其与预后的关联
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2526. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092526.
3
The epidemiology of spontaneous fever and hypothermia on admission of brain injury patients to intensive care units: a multicenter cohort study.颅脑损伤患者入住重症监护病房时自发性发热和低体温的流行病学:一项多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Oct;121(4):950-60. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132470. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Predicting mortality in traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.预测创伤性颅内出血患者的死亡率。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 22;132(2):552-559. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.JNS182199. Print 2020 Feb 1.
5
Risk Adjustment In Neurocritical care (RAIN)--prospective validation of risk prediction models for adult patients with acute traumatic brain injury to use to evaluate the optimum location and comparative costs of neurocritical care: a cohort study.神经重症监护中的风险调整(RAIN)——前瞻性验证用于评估神经重症监护最佳位置和比较成本的成人急性创伤性脑损伤风险预测模型:一项队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(23):vii-viii, 1-350. doi: 10.3310/hta17230.
6
Functional outcomes at 12 months for patients with traumatic brain injury, intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in an Australian neurocritical care unit: A prospective cohort study.澳大利亚神经重症监护病房创伤性脑损伤、脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血患者 12 个月的功能结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Nov;33(6):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
A predictive model for the risk of sepsis within 30 days of admission in patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis based on MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的 ICU 创伤性脑损伤患者入院后 30 天内脓毒症风险的预测模型:回顾性分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Aug 18;28(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01255-8.
8
Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on Head Computed Tomography Scan May Not Be Isolated: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study (TRACK-TBI) Study.头部计算机断层扫描显示孤立性创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血可能并非孤立存在:转化性创伤性脑损伤研究(TRACK-TBI)研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jun;41(11-12):1310-1322. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0253. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
9
Medical necessity of routine admission of children with mild traumatic brain injury to the intensive care unit.轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童常规入住重症监护病房的医疗必要性。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Jun;19(6):668-674. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.PEDS16419. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Costs, outcome and cost-effectiveness of neurocritical care: a multi-center observational study.神经危重症监护的成本、结果和成本效益:一项多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 20;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2151-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Prevalence and Factors Associated with the Prescription of Opioids for Head/Neck Pain after Elective Craniotomy for Tumor Resection/Vascular Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study.择期颅脑肿瘤切除/血管修复术后因头/颈部疼痛开具阿片类药物的流行情况及相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 23;59(1):28. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010028.
2
Acute Headache Management for Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An International Survey of Health Care Providers.急性头痛管理:蛛网膜下腔出血患者的国际医疗保健提供者调查。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Apr;38(2):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01571-7. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
3
Incidence of Delirium With Different Oral Opioids in Previously Opioid-Naive Patients.
不同口服阿片类药物在既往未使用过阿片类药物的患者中致谵妄的发生率。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Oct;39(10):1145-1151. doi: 10.1177/10499091211065171. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
Risk Factors for Opioid Utilization in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.颅内出血患者阿片类药物使用的风险因素。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Jun;36(3):964-973. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01404-z. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Scoping Review of Opioid Use After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后阿片类药物使用的范围综述。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(5):310-327. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000721.
6
A One-Day Prospective National Observational Study on Sedation-Analgesia of Patients with Brain Injury in French Intensive Care Units: The SEDA-BIP-ICU (Sedation-Analgesia in Brain Injury Patient in ICU) Study.一项为期一天的法国重症监护病房颅脑损伤患者镇静-镇痛的全国性前瞻性观察研究:SEDATION-ANALGESIA IN BRAIN INJURY PATIENT IN ICU(颅脑损伤患者 ICU 镇静-镇痛)研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Feb;36(1):266-278. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01298-x. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Short- and long-term opioid use in survivors of subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血幸存者的短期和长期阿片类药物使用情况。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;207:106770. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106770. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Change in opioid and analgesic use for headaches after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage over time.蛛网膜下腔出血后随时间变化的阿片类药物和头痛镇痛药物使用的变化。
Neurochirurgie. 2021 Sep;67(5):427-432. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Opioids in Post-stroke Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中风后疼痛中的阿片类药物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Nov 27;11:587050. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.587050. eCollection 2020.
10
Identification and Management of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后阵发性交感神经过度兴奋的识别与管理
Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 25;11:81. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00081. eCollection 2020.