Di Mauro Marco, Kittleson Michelle, Cacioli Giulio, Piazza Vito, Putini Rita Lucia, Gravino Rita, Polizzi Vincenzo, Montalto Andrea, Comisso Marina, Sbaraglia Fabio, Monda Emanuele, Petraio Andrea, De Feo Marisa, Amarelli Cristiano, Marra Claudio, Musumeci Francesco, Di Lorenzo Emilio, Masarone Daniele
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Avellino (ASL AV), 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Department of Cardiology, AORN dei Colli Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7102. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237102.
: Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) is a helpful parameter to predict the risk of acute postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A new method for calculating Ea, obtained by the ratio between transpulmonary gradient and stroke volume (Ea), has been proposed as a more accurate measure than the Ea obtained as the ratio between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and stroke volume (Ea). However, the role of Ea in predicting acute RVF post-LVAD implantation remains unclear. : A total of 35 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Acute RVF after LVAD implantation occurred in 12 patients (34%): 5 patients with moderate RVF (14% of total) and 7 patients with severe RVF. The Ea was not significantly different between the "severe RVF" vs. "not-severe RVF" groups (0.27 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.1, < 0.403). However, the combination of arterial elastance and central venous pressure was significantly different between the "not-severe RVF" group (central venous pressure < 14 mmHg and Ea < 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea < 0.24 mmHg/mL; < 0.005) and the "severe RVF" group (central venous pressure > 14 mmHg and Ea > 0.88 mmHg/mL or Ea > 0.24 mmHg/mL; < 0.005). : Ea is a reliable parameter of right ventricular afterload and helps discriminate the risk of acute RVF after LVAD implantation. The combined analysis of Ea and central venous pressure can also risk stratify patients undergoing LVAD implantation for the development of RVF.
肺动脉弹性(Ea)是预测左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后急性右心室衰竭(RVF)风险的一个有用参数。一种计算Ea的新方法已被提出,该方法通过经肺梯度与每搏量的比值获得(Ea),被认为比通过肺动脉收缩压与每搏量的比值获得的Ea更准确。然而,Ea在预测LVAD植入术后急性RVF中的作用仍不明确。
在这项回顾性分析中,共纳入了2018年至2021年期间接受LVAD植入的35例患者。LVAD植入术后12例患者(34%)发生急性RVF:5例为中度RVF(占总数的14%),7例为重度RVF。“重度RVF”组与“非重度RVF”组之间的Ea无显著差异(0.27±0.04 vs 0.23±0.1,P<0.403)。然而,“非重度RVF”组(中心静脉压<14 mmHg且Ea<0.88 mmHg/mL或Ea<0.24 mmHg/mL;P<0.005)和“重度RVF”组(中心静脉压>14 mmHg且Ea>0.88 mmHg/mL或Ea>0.24 mmHg/mL;P<0.005)之间动脉弹性与中心静脉压的组合存在显著差异。
Ea是右心室后负荷的可靠参数,有助于区分LVAD植入术后急性RVF的风险。Ea与中心静脉压的联合分析也可以对接受LVAD植入的患者发生RVF的风险进行分层。