Kim Jongchan, Ham Won Sik, Koo Kyo Chul, Lee Jongsoo, Ahn Hyun Kyu, Jeong Jae Yong, Baek Sang Yeop, Lee Su Jin, Lee Kwang Suk
Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Department of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 24;13(23):7110. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237110.
We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the artificial intelligence (AI)-based software INF-M01 in diagnosing suspected bladder tumors using cystoscopy images. Additionally, we aimed to assess the ability of INF-M01 to distinguish and mark suspected bladder cancer using whole cystoscopy images. : A randomized retrospective clinical trial was conducted using a total of 5670 cystoscopic images provided by three institutions, comprising 1890 images each (486 bladder cancer images and 1404 normal images). The images were randomly distributed into five sets (A-E), each containing 1890 photographs. INF-M01 analyzed the images in set A to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Sets B to E were analyzed by INF-M01 and four urologists, who marked the suspected bladder tumors. The Dice coefficient was used to compare the ability to differentiate bladder tumors. : For set A, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and 95% confidence intervals were 0.973 (0.955-0.984), 0.921 (0.906-0.934), and 0.934 (0.922-0.945), respectively. The mean value of the Dice coefficient of AI was 0.889 (0.873-0.927), while that of clinicians was 0.941 (0.903-0.963), indicating that AI showed a reliable ability to distinguish bladder tumors from normal bladder tissue. AI demonstrated a sensitivity similar to that of urologists (0.971 (0.971-0.983) vs. 0.921 (0.777-0.995)), but a lower specificity (0.920 (0.882-0.962) vs. 0.991 (0.984-0.996)) compared to the urologists. : INF-M01 demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in the diagnosis of bladder tumors. Additionally, it displayed an ability to distinguish and mark tumor regions from normal bladder tissue, similar to that of urologists. These results suggest that AI has promising diagnostic capabilities and clinical utility for urologists.
我们旨在评估基于人工智能(AI)的软件INF-M01使用膀胱镜检查图像诊断疑似膀胱肿瘤的准确性。此外,我们旨在评估INF-M01使用整个膀胱镜检查图像区分并标记疑似膀胱癌的能力。:使用三个机构提供的总共5670张膀胱镜检查图像进行了一项随机回顾性临床试验,每个机构提供1890张图像(486张膀胱癌图像和1404张正常图像)。这些图像被随机分为五组(A-E),每组包含1890张照片。INF-M01分析A组中的图像以评估敏感性、特异性和准确性。B组至E组由INF-M01和四位泌尿科医生进行分析,他们标记了疑似膀胱肿瘤。使用Dice系数比较区分膀胱肿瘤的能力。:对于A组,敏感性、特异性、准确性和95%置信区间分别为0.973(0.955-0.984)、0.921(0.906-0.934)和0.934(0.922-0.945)。AI的Dice系数平均值为0.889(0.873-0.927),而临床医生的平均值为0.941(0.903-0.963),这表明AI具有将膀胱肿瘤与正常膀胱组织区分开来的可靠能力。AI表现出与泌尿科医生相似的敏感性(0.971(0.971-0.983)对0.921(0.777-0.995)),但与泌尿科医生相比特异性较低(0.920(0.882-0.962)对0.991(0.984-0.996))。:INF-M01在膀胱肿瘤诊断中表现出令人满意的准确性。此外,它表现出与泌尿科医生相似的从正常膀胱组织中区分并标记肿瘤区域的能力。这些结果表明,AI对泌尿科医生具有有前景的诊断能力和临床实用性。