Sciacchitano Salvatore, Rugge Massimo, Bartolazzi Armando
Department of Life Sciences, Health and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Department of Medicine DIMED Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 30;13(23):7290. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237290.
The advent of advanced molecular diagnostic techniques has revealed plenty of information about signaling pathways and gene regulation in cancer, as well as new inputs for the classification of cancer subtypes, diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of response to therapy. However, in most cases we do not have single biomarkers yet and, therefore, the final diagnosis is often rendered by the combination of multiple results by means of complex algorithms, eventually leading to an increase in their costs. The problem of the costs of such tests is particularly relevant in the case of thyroid cancer (TC), because of the observed increase in the number of patients affected by thyroid nodules (TN)s, in what is considered a global pandemic. High-income countries can afford the cost of the advanced molecular tests for such a multitude of TNs, since they are covered by private insurances. People living in upper-middle, lower-middle, and especially in low-income countries, where the costs for these advanced molecular tests are supported by general taxation and out-of-pocket payments, are exposed as a personal financial burden. Immunohistochemistry in cancer management represents an extremely cost-effective method in different clinical scenarios. In the preoperative recognition of TC, the use of such method, based on Galectin-3 and others protein markers, such as HMBE1, proved to be effective in diagnosing TC in TNs indeterminate at conventional cytology (Bethesda classification III or IV), with an extremely low cost. Moreover, Galectin-3 fulfills one of the major criteria of an ideal marker, being involved in the thyroid cell transformation. Despite this evidence, Galectin-3 ThyroTest is not considered and not even mentioned in many reviews, focused on the appropriate identification of TC, as well as in studies where the cost-effectiveness of the different approaches is comparatively evaluated. The aim of this review is to emphasize the value of the Galectin-3 based immunohistochemistry as a cheap and "good enough" method in the preoperative diagnosis of TC especially in, but not limited to, low-middle income countries.
先进分子诊断技术的出现揭示了大量有关癌症信号通路和基因调控的信息,以及癌症亚型分类、诊断、预后和治疗反应预测的新依据。然而,在大多数情况下,我们尚未拥有单一生物标志物,因此,最终诊断往往是通过复杂算法综合多种结果得出的,这最终导致检测成本增加。由于甲状腺结节(TN)患者数量在全球范围内呈上升趋势,这种检测成本问题在甲状腺癌(TC)中尤为突出。高收入国家能够承担针对如此众多TN进行先进分子检测的费用,因为这些检测由私人保险覆盖。而生活在中高收入、中低收入尤其是低收入国家的人们,这些先进分子检测的费用由一般税收和自付费用承担,这成为了个人的经济负担。免疫组化在癌症管理中是不同临床场景下极具成本效益的方法。在TC的术前诊断中,基于半乳糖凝集素-3和其他蛋白质标志物(如HMBE1)的这种方法,在诊断传统细胞学检查不确定(贝塞斯达分类III或IV)的TN中的TC时被证明是有效的,且成本极低。此外,半乳糖凝集素-3符合理想标志物的主要标准之一,它参与甲状腺细胞转化。尽管有这些证据,但在许多专注于TC正确识别的综述以及比较评估不同方法成本效益的研究中,半乳糖凝集素-3甲状腺检测并未被考虑甚至提及。本综述的目的是强调基于半乳糖凝集素-3的免疫组化作为一种廉价且“足够好”的方法在TC术前诊断中的价值,特别是在但不限于中低收入国家。