• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国癌症筛查的年度成本。

The Annual Cost of Cancer Screening in the United States.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (M.T.H., B.L., J.M.C., V.P.D.).

Office of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (D.R.L.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1170-1178. doi: 10.7326/M24-0375. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

DOI:10.7326/M24-0375
PMID:39102723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer has substantial health, quality-of-life, and economic impacts. Screening may decrease cancer mortality and treatment costs, but the cost of screening in the United States is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the annual cost of initial cancer screening (that is, screening without follow-up costs) in the United States in 2021.

DESIGN

Model using national health care survey and cost resources data.

SETTING

U.S. health care systems and institutions.

PARTICIPANTS

People eligible for breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer screening with available data.

MEASUREMENTS

The number of people screened and associated health care system costs by insurance status in 2021 dollars.

RESULTS

Total health care system costs for initial cancer screenings in the United States in 2021 were estimated at $43 billion. Approximately 88.3% of costs were attributable to private insurance; 8.5% to Medicare; and 3.2% to Medicaid, other government programs, and uninsured persons. Screening for colorectal cancer represented approximately 64% of the total cost; screening colonoscopy represented about 55% of the total. Facility costs (amounts paid to facilities where testing occurred) were major drivers of the total estimated costs of screening.

LIMITATIONS

All data on receipt of cancer screening are based on self-report from national health care surveys. Estimates do not include costs of follow-up for positive or abnormal screening results. Variations in costs based on geography and provider or health care organization are not fully captured.

CONCLUSION

The $43 billion estimated annual cost for initial cancer screening in the United States in 2021 is less than the reported annual cost of cancer treatment in the United States in the first 12 months after diagnosis. Identification of cancer screening costs and their drivers is critical to help inform policy and develop programmatic priorities, particularly for enhancing access to recommended cancer screening services.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

摘要

背景

癌症对健康、生活质量和经济都有重大影响。筛查可能会降低癌症死亡率和治疗成本,但美国的筛查成本尚不清楚。

目的

估计 2021 年美国初始癌症筛查(即无后续成本的筛查)的年度成本。

设计

使用国家卫生保健调查和成本资源数据的模型。

设置

美国卫生保健系统和机构。

参与者

有资格进行乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌筛查且有可用数据的人群。

测量

按保险状况分类的 2021 年筛查人数和相关医疗保健系统成本。

结果

2021 年美国初始癌症筛查的总医疗保健系统成本估计为 430 亿美元。约 88.3%的成本归因于私人保险;8.5%归因于医疗保险;3.2%归因于医疗补助、其他政府计划和无保险者。结直肠癌筛查约占总成本的 64%;结肠镜检查约占总成本的 55%。设施成本(支付给进行检测的医疗机构的金额)是筛查总估计成本的主要驱动因素。

局限性

所有关于癌症筛查接受情况的数据均基于国家卫生保健调查的自我报告。估计不包括对阳性或异常筛查结果的随访成本。基于地理位置和提供者或卫生保健组织的成本差异并未完全涵盖。

结论

2021 年美国每年估计为初始癌症筛查花费 430 亿美元,低于美国在诊断后 12 个月内报告的癌症治疗年度成本。确定癌症筛查成本及其驱动因素对于帮助制定政策和制定计划重点至关重要,特别是对于增强获得推荐的癌症筛查服务的机会。

主要资金来源

无。

相似文献

1
The Annual Cost of Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的年度成本。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1170-1178. doi: 10.7326/M24-0375. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Optimal Stopping Ages for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查的最佳停止年龄。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451715. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51715.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare Database Study of 135,194 Claims.择期全髋关节置换术用于治疗非骨关节炎的适应证与更高的成本和资源利用相关:一项基于 Medicare 数据库的 135194 例患者的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1159-1170. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002922. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Clinics.社区诊所中非侵入性结直肠癌筛查的成本效益
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54938.
8
Economic Burden and Provider Referral Patterns Among Patients with Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Receiving Chemoradiotherapy in the United States.美国不可切除的 III 期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受放化疗的经济负担及医疗服务提供者转诊模式
Adv Ther. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03239-y.
9
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer: systematic reviews.计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jan;10(3):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta10030.
10
Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.使用粪便潜血试验(Hemoccult)筛查结直肠癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001216.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeled Cost-Effectiveness of a Rideshare Program to Facilitate Colonoscopy Completion.一项促进结肠镜检查完成的拼车计划的模拟成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30515.
2
Colorectal cancer screening blood test: awareness and willingness among a national sample of adults post-Federal and Drug Administration approval.结直肠癌筛查血液检测:联邦药物管理局批准后全国成年人样本中的知晓度与意愿度
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):1853. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23065-9.
3
Lung Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: Contribution of the 2020 NHIS Estimates to National and State-Level Trends.
美国肺癌筛查率:2020年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)估计值对国家和州层面趋势的贡献。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107626. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
4
A Cost-Effective Two-Step Approach for Multi-Cancer Early Detection in High-Risk Populations.一种用于高危人群多癌早期检测的经济高效的两步法。
Cancer Res Commun. 2025 Jan 1;5(1):150-156. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0508.
5
The Unappreciated Value of a Cheap, 'Good Enough' Method of Detecting Thyroid Cancer.一种廉价且“足够好”的甲状腺癌检测方法的未被重视的价值。
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 30;13(23):7290. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237290.
6
How Good Is Good Enough? What Should Be the Target for CRC Screening?多好才算足够好?结直肠癌筛查的目标应该是什么?
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Dec 13. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08698-x.
7
Projected Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Novel Molecular Blood-Based or Stool-Based Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer.新型基于血液或粪便的分子结直肠癌筛查检测的预期影响和成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Dec;177(12):1610-1620. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00910. Epub 2024 Oct 29.