Suppr超能文献

面中部骨折气道管理的争议:文献综述与算法建议

Controversies in the Management of the Airway in Panfacial Fractures: A Literature Review and Algorithm Proposal.

作者信息

Marí-Roig Antonio, McLeod Niall M H, De Lange Jan, Dubois Leander, García Reija Maria Fe, Van Minnen Bauke, Essig Harald

机构信息

Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.

Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 30;13(23):7294. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237294.

Abstract

Panfacial fractures are complex fractures involving multiple regions of the facial skeleton and may require multiple surgeries over a relatively short period. They are often associated with polytrauma and other injuries including neurotrauma, which require either immediate (ATLS) airway management, prolonged intubation, or repeated intubations for staged surgeries. The choice of airway for the surgical management of these fractures is difficult, as an assessment of the occlusion is required, and the central nasal complex and/or skull base may be involved, making classical orotracheal or nasotracheal intubation problematic. Submental intubation is increasingly reported as a method of airway management with the aim of avoiding a tracheostomy and its related complications. A review of the different techniques of airway management in the elective treatment of panfacial fractures was performed, focusing on the pros and cons of each method. Most articles were retrospective studies, with only one prospective study comparing submental intubation to tracheostomy in panfacial fractures. An algorithm for the management of the airway in panfacial fractures was presented, based on a sequential assessment of the existing airway, the surgical access required, and the need for prolonged or repeated intubation. Front of neck access, orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation, and submental intubation are all appropriate techniques in different circumstances, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are presented.

摘要

面中份骨折是累及面部骨骼多个区域的复杂骨折,可能需要在相对较短的时间内进行多次手术。它们常与多发伤及其他损伤相关,包括神经创伤,这需要立即进行(高级创伤生命支持)气道管理、长时间插管或为分期手术进行反复插管。这些骨折手术治疗的气道选择很困难,因为需要评估咬合情况,且中央鼻复合体和/或颅底可能受累,这使得经典的经口气管插管或经鼻气管插管存在问题。越来越多的报道称颏下插管是一种气道管理方法,目的是避免气管切开及其相关并发症。本文对择期治疗面中份骨折时不同气道管理技术进行了综述,重点关注每种方法的优缺点。大多数文章为回顾性研究,仅有一项前瞻性研究比较了面中份骨折患者颏下插管与气管切开的情况。基于对现有气道、所需手术入路以及长时间或反复插管需求的序贯评估,提出了面中份骨折气道管理的算法。颈部前方入路、经口气管插管、经鼻气管插管和颏下插管在不同情况下都是合适的技术,并阐述了每种技术的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f51/11642650/29f8becf0da1/jcm-13-07294-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验