Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗治疗白塞病所致黄斑囊样水肿的比较研究

Comparative Study of Adalimumab, Infliximab and Certolizumab Pegol in the Treatment of Cystoid Macular Edema Due to Behçet's Disease.

作者信息

Barroso-García Nuria, Martín-Varillas José Luis, Ferraz-Amaro Iván, Sánchez-Bilbao Lara, Martín-Gutiérrez Adrián, Adán Alfredo, Hernanz-Rodríguez Inés, Beltrán-Catalán Emma, Cordero-Coma Miguel, Díaz-Valle David, Hernández-Garfella Marisa, Martínez-Costa Lucía, Díaz-Llopis Manuel, Herreras José M, Maíz-Alonso Olga, Torre-Salaberri Ignacio, Atanes-Sandoval Antonio, Insúa Santos, Almodóvar-González Raquel, Fanlo Patricia, Aberasturi Juan Ramón De Dios, García-Aparicio Ángel, Rodríguez-Montero Sergio, Jovaní Vega, Moya-Alvarado Patricia, Peña Sainz-Pardo Eva, Calvo-Río Vanesa, Demetrio-Pablo Rosalía, Hernández José Luis, Blanco Ricardo

机构信息

Rheumatology, Hospital Regional Universitario, Universidad de Málaga (UMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain.

Rheumatology, Hospital de Laredo, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), 39770 Cantabria, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 4;13(23):7388. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237388.

Abstract

The leading cause of blindness due to non-infectious uveitis is cystoid macular edema (CME). Behçet's disease (BD) is one of the most commonly conditions related to CME. To compare the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (IFX) and certolizumab (CZP) in refractory CME due to BD. : Multicenter study of BD-CME patients with no response to glucocorticoids (GCs) and at least one conventional immunosuppressive drug. At baseline, all patients presented CME, defined by OCT > 300 µ. The effectiveness of ADA, IFX and CZP was assessed over a 2-year period from baseline using the following ocular parameters: macular thickness (µm), visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber (AC) cells and vitritis. Mixed-effects regression models were applied. a total of 50 patients (75 eyes) were studied (ADA = 25; IFX = 15 and CZP = 10). No significant differences in demographic parameters were found among the three groups. However, individuals in the CZP group had a significantly extended time from diagnosis to treatment onset (72 (36-120) months, = 0.03) and had received a higher number of biological therapies (1.7 ± 1.1) compared to the ADA and IFX groups. Within the CZP group, ADA and IFX were previously administrated in seven patients. After 2 years of follow-up, a rapid and sustained reduction in macular thickness was noted in all three groups with no significant differences between them. Additionally, enhancements in BCVA, AC cells and vitritis were also observed. No serious adverse events were reported in the CZP group, although one isolated case of bacteremia was documented in the ADA group. ADA, IFX and CZP appear to be effective and safe treatments for refractory CME in BD. CZP seems to remain effective even in patients with an insufficient response to ADA and/or IFX. ADA, IFX and CZP appear to be effective and safe treatments for refractory CME in BD. CZP seems to remain effective even in patients with an insufficient response to ADA and/or IFX.

摘要

非感染性葡萄膜炎导致失明的主要原因是黄斑囊样水肿(CME)。白塞病(BD)是与CME相关的最常见病症之一。为比较阿达木单抗(ADA)、英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和赛妥珠单抗(CZP)治疗BD所致难治性CME的有效性和安全性。:对糖皮质激素(GCs)及至少一种传统免疫抑制药物治疗无效的BD-CME患者进行多中心研究。基线时,所有患者均表现为CME,经光学相干断层扫描(OCT)定义为>300µ。从基线开始的2年期间,使用以下眼部参数评估ADA、IFX和CZP的有效性:黄斑厚度(µm)、视力(最佳矫正视力,BCVA)、前房(AC)细胞和玻璃体炎。应用混合效应回归模型。共研究了50例患者(75只眼)(ADA组=25例;IFX组=15例;CZP组=10例)。三组间人口统计学参数无显著差异。然而,与ADA组和IFX组相比,CZP组患者从诊断到开始治疗的时间显著延长(72(36 - 120)个月,P = 0.03),且接受生物治疗的次数更多(1.7±1.1次)。在CZP组中,7例患者曾接受过ADA和IFX治疗。经过2年随访,三组黄斑厚度均迅速且持续降低,组间无显著差异。此外,BCVA、AC细胞和玻璃体炎也有改善。CZP组未报告严重不良事件,尽管ADA组记录了1例孤立的菌血症病例。ADA、IFX和CZP似乎是治疗BD所致难治性CME的有效且安全的疗法。即使对ADA和/或IFX反应不足的患者,CZP似乎仍有效。ADA、IFX和CZP似乎是治疗BD所致难治性CME的有效且安全的疗法。即使对ADA和/或IFX反应不足的患者,CZP似乎仍有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1972/11642836/bd53148a78d9/jcm-13-07388-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验