• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术、腹腔镜子宫切除术和经阴道子宫切除术的单中心回顾性研究。

A single center retrospective study of vNOTES hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy operations.

作者信息

Mollahüseyinoğlu Küllaç Fatmanur, Özdemir Ayşe Zehra, Yildiz Çağlanur

机构信息

Bafra State Hospital, Obstetrics-Gynecology Department, Samsun, Turkey.

Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics-Gynecology Department, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40881. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040881.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000040881
PMID:39686461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11651429/
Abstract

In our study, we aimed to retrospectively compare vNOTES hysterectomy, a new method, with a vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Our study included 186 hysterectomy cases (62 vNOTES hysterectomy, 62 VH, and 62 TLH) with benign indications diagnosed between 2021 and 2022. Our study is a retrospective and single-center study. Three surgical techniques were evaluated comparatively according to demographic characteristics and surgical results. The least hemoglobin (Hb) decline and the longest mean operation time were observed in the vNOTES hysterectomy group. When discharge times were compared, it was observed that the vNOTES hysterectomy group was discharged significantly shorter than the TLH group (P: .022 < .05). The lowest 6th-hour pain score of 1.53 was observed in the vNOTES hysterectomy group. History of pelvic surgery and cesarean section were higher in the vNOTES hysterectomy group than in the VH group. Also, oophorectomy and salpingectomy rates were higher in the vNOTES hysterectomy group than in the VH group. When intraoperative complications were evaluated, bladder perforation was encountered in one vNOTES hysterectomy and two VH operations, and bleeding was observed in one VH operation. The VH group was the least costly operation compared to vNOTES hysterectomy and TLH (P: .003 < .05, P: .01 < .05). Aesthetic results can be achieved for patients by using the vaginal route. With all these results, we believe that vNOTES hysterectomy is a safe alternative to TLH and VH.

摘要

在我们的研究中,我们旨在回顾性地比较一种新方法——经自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术(vNOTES子宫切除术)与阴道子宫切除术(VH)和全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)。我们的研究纳入了2021年至2022年期间诊断为良性指征的186例子宫切除术病例(62例vNOTES子宫切除术、62例VH和62例TLH)。我们的研究是一项回顾性单中心研究。根据人口统计学特征和手术结果对三种手术技术进行了比较评估。vNOTES子宫切除术组观察到血红蛋白(Hb)下降最少且平均手术时间最长。比较出院时间时,发现vNOTES子宫切除术组的出院时间明显短于TLH组(P:0.022<0.05)。vNOTES子宫切除术组观察到第6小时最低疼痛评分为1.53。vNOTES子宫切除术组盆腔手术和剖宫产史高于VH组。此外,vNOTES子宫切除术组卵巢切除术和输卵管切除术的发生率高于VH组。评估术中并发症时,1例vNOTES子宫切除术和2例VH手术中出现膀胱穿孔,1例VH手术中观察到出血。与vNOTES子宫切除术和TLH相比,VH组手术成本最低(P:0.003<0.05,P:0.01<0.05)。通过阴道途径可为患者实现美学效果。基于所有这些结果,我们认为vNOTES子宫切除术是TLH和VH的一种安全替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/11651429/66960b6e666f/medi-103-e40881-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/11651429/66960b6e666f/medi-103-e40881-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/11651429/66960b6e666f/medi-103-e40881-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A single center retrospective study of vNOTES hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy operations.一项关于单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术、腹腔镜子宫切除术和经阴道子宫切除术的单中心回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40881. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040881.
2
Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a paired sample cross-sectional study.比较经阴道辅助自然腔道内镜手术与传统腹腔镜下子宫切除术:配对样本的横断面研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;41(3):434-438. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1741523. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Retrospective analysis between total laparoscopic and vNOTES hysterectomy in obese patients: single-center study.肥胖患者中全腹腔镜与 vNOTES 子宫切除术的回顾性分析:单中心研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;309(6):2735-2740. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07467-5. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
5
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.使用电外科双极血管封闭技术的全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术和经腹全子宫切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1341-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3571-3. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
6
Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术、经阴道子宫切除术及经腹子宫切除术的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Apr;277(4):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0481-7. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
7
Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.65岁及以上女性良性疾病的腹腔镜与经阴道子宫切除术:倾向评分匹配分析
Menopause. 2015 Jan;22(1):32-5. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000263.
8
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道子宫切除术:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):206-217.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
9
The Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and vNOTES Hysterectomy in Obese Patients.肥胖患者腹腔镜子宫切除术与 vNOTES 子宫切除术的手术结局比较。
J Invest Surg. 2022 Apr;35(4):862-867. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1927262. Epub 2021 May 26.
10
VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol-a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy.VaNoLaH试验:一项研究方案——一项多国随机对照试验,包括两项相同的子研究,比较经阴道与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)子宫切除术,以及腹腔镜与vNOTES子宫切除术。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 23;14(4):e081979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081979.

本文引用的文献

1
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNOTES) retroperitoneal sentinel lymph node BIOPSY compared with conventional laparoscopy in patients with endometrial cancer.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(VNOTES)与传统腹腔镜在子宫内膜癌患者中的腹膜后前哨淋巴结活检比较。
Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;55:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102099. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
2
Sentinel Node Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer by Retroperitoneal Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study.经腹膜后经阴道自然腔道内镜手术行子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结活检:一项初步研究
Front Surg. 2022 May 9;9:907548. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.907548. eCollection 2022.
3
Is V-NOTES Hysterectomy as Safe and Feasible as Outpatient Surgery Compared with Vaginal Hysterectomy?
与经阴道子宫切除术相比,单孔腹腔镜经阴道子宫切除术作为门诊手术是否同样安全可行?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 May;29(5):665-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
4
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and vNOTES Hysterectomy for Undescended-Enlarged Uteri.完全腹腔镜子宫切除术与单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗子宫脱垂并增大的手术效果比较
J Invest Surg. 2022 Apr;35(4):918-923. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1958111. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
vNOTES Hysterectomy for Large Uteri: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 114 Patients.NOTES 子宫切除术治疗大子宫:114 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jul;28(7):1351-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a paired sample cross-sectional study.比较经阴道辅助自然腔道内镜手术与传统腹腔镜下子宫切除术:配对样本的横断面研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;41(3):434-438. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1741523. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
7
Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4.
8
Pelvic lymphadenectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for early-stage endometrial cancer.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)行盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期子宫内膜癌。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):211-212. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
[Vaginal hysterectomy in outpatient procedure: Feasibility and satisfaction study].
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Feb;46(2):65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.