Rastegar Ella Rose, Görgens Sophia, Beltran Del Rio Manuel, Nilsson Sjolander Elizabeth, Landers Joseph, Meyer Cristy, Rolston Daniel, Klein Eric, Sfakianos Maria, Bank Matthew, Jafari Daniel
Department of Surgery at Zucker School of Medicine, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Dec 11;9(1):e001588. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001588. eCollection 2024.
We sought to determine the optimal time to pre-activation for trauma team activation that resulted in maximum team efficiency, measured by the time to complete critical actions (TCCAs) during resuscitation. We hypothesized that there exists a time window for trauma team pre-activation that minimizes TCCA.
This is an exploratory retrospective analysis of video-reviewed traumas at a level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2018 to 28 February, 2022 that received the highest trauma team activation and had a pre-arrival notification. A total of 11 TCCA categories were calculated using video timestamps. To compare TCCAs from different categories, normalized TCCAs (nTCCAs) were calculated by dividing each TCCA by the median time of its category. Pre-activation times were categorized into three groups: long pre-activation (≥8 min), mid pre-activation (≥4 and ≤7 min), and short pre-activation (≥0 and ≤4).
There were 466 video-recorded level 1 trauma activations, which resulted in 2334 TCCAs. Of the 466 activations, 152 occured on the patient's arrival (0 min pre-activation). The majority (425) of patients had a pre-activation time of <7 min. Pre-activation of 4-6 min resulted in all but blood transfusion TCCAs being <15 min. Furthermore, mid pre-activation category corresponded to the most efficient trauma teams, with nTCCAs significantly shorter (median=0.75 (IQR 0.3-1.3)) than long (median=1 (IQR 0.6-2)) or short activation groups (median=1 (IQR 0.6-1.6)). A greater proportion of nTCCAs were shorter than their category median in the mid pre-activation category compared with long and short categories (59.1% vs 48.3% and 40%, respectively; p<0.01).
In this exploratory study, a pre-activation time of 4-7 min is associated with the best team efficiency as measured by TCCAs during trauma team activations. This timeframe may be an optimal window for trauma team activations but needs prospective and external validation.
Level 4 retrospective exploratory study.
我们试图确定创伤团队激活前预激活的最佳时间,该时间能使团队效率最大化,以复苏期间完成关键行动的时间(TCCA)来衡量。我们假设存在一个创伤团队预激活的时间窗口,可使TCCA最小化。
这是一项对2018年1月1日至2022年2月28日在一家一级创伤中心接受最高级别创伤团队激活且有院前通知的视频回顾性创伤进行的探索性分析。使用视频时间戳计算了总共11个TCCA类别。为比较不同类别的TCCA,通过将每个TCCA除以其类别中位数来计算标准化TCCA(nTCCA)。预激活时间分为三组:长预激活(≥8分钟)、中预激活(≥4且≤7分钟)和短预激活(≥0且≤4分钟)。
有466次视频记录的一级创伤激活,产生了2334个TCCA。在这466次激活中,152次发生在患者到达时(预激活时间为0分钟)。大多数(425例)患者的预激活时间<7分钟。4 - 6分钟的预激活导致除输血TCCA外,所有TCCA均<15分钟。此外,中预激活类别对应效率最高的创伤团队,其nTCCA显著短于长预激活(中位数 = 1(四分位间距0.6 - 2))或短预激活组(中位数 = 1(四分位间距0.6 - 1.6))(中位数 = 0.75(四分位间距0.3 - 1.3))。与长预激活和短预激活类别相比,中预激活类别中短于其类别中位数的nTCCA比例更高(分别为59.1%对48.3%和40%;p<0.01)。
在这项探索性研究中,4 - 7分钟的预激活时间与创伤团队激活期间以TCCA衡量的最佳团队效率相关。这个时间范围可能是创伤团队激活的最佳窗口,但需要前瞻性和外部验证。
4级回顾性探索性研究。