Competency and consent to treatment.
作者信息
Eth S
出版信息
JAMA. 1985 Feb 8;253(6):778-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1985.03350300064019.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Competency and consent to treatment.
JAMA. 1985 Feb 8;253(6):778-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1985.03350300064019.
2
The irreducibly clinical character of bioethics.生物伦理学不可简化的临床特性。
J Med Philos. 1991 Feb;16(1):53-70. doi: 10.1093/jmp/16.1.53.
3
The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution.医学伦理学中自主性与行善原则之间的冲突：一种解决方案的提议。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1987 Spring;3:23-46.
4
Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. II.自主性、善行与知情同意：重新思考它们之间的联系。第二部分
Cancer Invest. 1986;4(4):353-61. doi: 10.3109/07357908609017514.
5
Beneficence today, or autonomy (maybe) tomorrow?今日的善行，抑或明日的自主权（或许如此）？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jan-Feb;30(1):18; discussion 18-9.
6
Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. I.自主性、善行和知情同意：重新思考它们之间的联系。一
Cancer Invest. 1986;4(3):257-69. doi: 10.3109/07357908609018455.
7
Heroics and healing.英勇行为与治愈
HEC Forum. 1990;2(5):335-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00057832.
8
An aside on the role of autonomy in informed consent.
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Spring;3(1):17-8. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80228-2.
9
A critique of traditional relationship models.对传统关系模式的批判。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Winter;3(1):27-37. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004680.
10
Patient autonomy in chronic illness.
Fam Community Health. 1987 May;10(1):24-34. doi: 10.1097/00003727-198705000-00006.
引用本文的文献
1
Where respect for autonomy is not the answer.当尊重自主性并非答案时。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jan 4;292(6512):48-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6512.48.
Zotero 插件