Badwal Randeep Singh, Cavo Paul, Panesar Mandip
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 17;26:e55982. doi: 10.2196/55982.
As of 2021, at least 4 out of every 5 hospitals offered patients access to clinical notes via a web-based patient portal, a number that is expected to grow because of the 21st Century Cures Act. There is limited data on how open note use may have evolved over time or which types of clinical interactions were viewed most in the outpatient setting.
This study aims to analyze trends in outpatient open note access over time; characterize usage in terms of age, sex, and clinical interaction type; and assess the method of access to help uncover areas of improvement in patient engagement and identify further areas of research.
A retrospective observational study was conducted at Erie County Medical Center from November 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, to coincide with the time that open notes went live. Outpatient note access and account logs were downloaded from the portal and combined into a single dataset consisting of 18,384 note accesses by 4615 users, with column headings of the patient index, sex, age, note title that was accessed, clinical interaction type, time stamp of note creation, time stamp of access, and method of access (web vs mobile). A separate table was created with sex data for all 35,273 portal accounts. Microsoft Excel and Microsoft Power Query were used to combine and analyze the data.
During the study period, 4615 portal users viewed 12,150 documents for a total of 18,384 times, averaging 2.6 notes per patient viewed 4 times. Only 13.1% (4615/35,273) of all portal inpatient and outpatient registrants viewed their outpatient notes. There was a female predominance in those who viewed notes (2926/4615, 63.4%; P<.001), while 56.8% (20,047/35,273) of all portal registrants were female. Users in their 30s and 50s accessed more notes than other age groups. The ratio of mobile-to-web access of notes tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, which was not observed in those aged ≥90 years. Notes regarding COVID-19 assessments were the most accessed among all clinical interactions (4725/12,150, 38.9%). Overall, the number of users accessing notes reached a maximum of 1968 before declining to 1027 by the end of the study period.
Open note access was largely dominated by COVID-19 assessments, and the number of users viewing their notes has declined over time as the pandemic subsided. Furthermore, female patients and those aged in their 30s as well as 50s viewed more notes than other groups. Finally, the percentage of notes viewed via a mobile device tended to decrease as a function of increasing age, showing that web-based access of open notes is an important modality for older patients.
截至2021年,每五家医院中至少有四家通过基于网络的患者门户为患者提供临床记录访问权限,由于《21世纪治愈法案》,这一数字预计还会增长。关于开放记录的使用随时间如何演变,或者在门诊环境中哪些类型的临床互动被查看最多的数据有限。
本研究旨在分析门诊开放记录访问随时间的趋势;根据年龄、性别和临床互动类型描述使用情况;并评估访问方法,以帮助发现患者参与度方面的改进领域并确定进一步的研究领域。
于2021年11月1日至2022年12月31日在伊利县医疗中心进行了一项回顾性观察研究,与开放记录上线时间一致。从门户下载门诊记录访问和账户日志,并合并到一个由4615名用户的18384次记录访问组成的单一数据集中,列标题包括患者索引、性别、年龄、访问的记录标题、临床互动类型、记录创建时间戳、访问时间戳以及访问方法(网络与移动)。为所有35273个门户账户创建了一个包含性别数据的单独表格。使用Microsoft Excel和Microsoft Power Query来合并和分析数据。
在研究期间,4615名门户用户查看了12150份文档,总计18384次,平均每位患者查看2.6份记录,查看4次。所有门户住院和门诊注册者中只有13.1%(4615/35273)查看了他们的门诊记录。查看记录的人群中女性占多数(2926/4615,63.4%;P<0.001),而所有门户注册者中5