Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Systems, Populations and Leadership Department, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):592-599. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06304-0. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
In an effort to foster patient engagement, some healthcare systems provide their patients with open notes, enabling them to access their clinical notes online. In January 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented online access to clinical notes ("VA Notes") through the Blue Button feature of its patient portal.
To measure the association of online patient access to clinical notes with changes in healthcare utilization and clinician documentation behaviors.
A retrospective cohort study.
Patients accessing My HealtheVet (MHV), the VA's online patient portal, between July 2011 and January 2015.
Use of healthcare services (primary care clinic visits and online electronic secure messaging), and characteristics of physician clinical documentation (readability of notes).
Among 882,575 unique portal users, those who accessed clinical notes (16.2%; N = 122,972) were younger, more racially homogenous (white), and less likely to be financially vulnerable. Compared with non-users, Notes users more frequently used the secure messaging feature on the portal (mean of 2.6 messages (SD 7.0) v. 0.87 messages (SD 3.3) in January-July 2013), but their higher use of secure messaging began prior to VA Notes implementation, and thus was not temporally related to the implementation. When comparing clinic visit rates pre- and post-implementation, Notes users had a small but significant increase in rate of 0.36 primary care clinic visits (2012 v. 2013) compared to portal users who did not view their Notes (p = 0.01). At baseline, the mean reading ease of primary care clinical notes was 53.8 (SD 10.1) and did not improve after implementation of VA Notes.
VA Notes users were different than patients with portal access who did not view their notes online, and they had higher rates of healthcare service use prior to and after VA Notes implementation. Opportunities exist to improve clinical note access and readability.
为了促进患者参与,一些医疗保健系统为患者提供开放的笔记,使他们能够在线访问他们的临床笔记。2013 年 1 月,退伍军人事务部(VA)通过其患者门户的蓝色按钮功能实施了在线访问临床笔记(“VA 笔记”)。
衡量在线患者访问临床笔记与医疗保健利用和临床医生记录行为变化的关联。
回顾性队列研究。
2011 年 7 月至 2015 年 1 月期间访问 My HealtheVet(MHV),即 VA 在线患者门户的患者。
医疗服务的使用(初级保健诊所就诊和在线电子安全消息传递)以及医生临床记录的特征(记录的可读性)。
在 882,575 名独特的门户用户中,访问临床笔记的患者(16.2%;N=122,972)年龄较小,种族更加单一(白人),财务脆弱性较低。与非用户相比,Notes 用户更频繁地使用门户上的安全消息传递功能(2013 年 1 月至 7 月的平均 2.6 条消息(SD 7.0)与 0.87 条消息(SD 3.3)),但他们对安全消息传递的更高使用始于 VA Notes 实施之前,因此与实施没有时间关系。在比较实施前后的就诊率时,Notes 用户的就诊率略有但显著增加,比不查看 Notes 的门户用户增加了 0.36 次初级保健诊所就诊(2012 年比 2013 年)(p=0.01)。在基线时,初级保健临床记录的平均易读性为 53.8(SD 10.1),实施 VA 笔记后并未提高。
VA Notes 用户与具有门户访问权限但不在线查看其笔记的患者不同,并且在 VA Notes 实施前后,他们的医疗服务使用率更高。存在改善临床笔记访问和可读性的机会。