Correia Ana Luisa, Silva Ana Rita, Mira Filipe, Pinto Rui, Ferreira Emanuel, Guedes Marques Maria, Romãozinho Catarina, Alves Rui
Department of Nephrology, Coimbra Hospital and University Center, Coimbra, Portugal.
University Clinic of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal.
Hemodial Int. 2025 Jan;29(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/hdi.13193. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure remains common despite preoperative ultrasound mapping. Identifying predictive biomarkers can help anticipate primary failure and reducing invasive procedures. Our study aimed to identify clinical and analytical risk factors for primary AVF failure or delay.
A prospective study (October 2022-March 2023) included adult patients scheduled for AVF creation. In all patients, a preoperative ultrasound mapping was conducted and AVF maturation assessed at least 6 weeks post-surgery. Clinical, analytical, and demographic data were collected.
Eighty patients were included, 62.5% male, and mean age 66.3 years. For distal anastomosis, preoperative vein (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mm; p 0.002) and supply artery (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3 mm; p 0.001) diameters were significant factors impacting primary failure. Also, for proximal anastomosis, the artery diameter (2.4 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4 mm; p 0.01) had an impact on AVF maturation. ROC curves established for distal AVF a vein diameter cutoff of 3.25 mm (AUC 77.2%) and artery cut-off of 2.35 mm (AUC 74.6%) and for proximal AVF an artery cutoff of 2.25 mm (AUC 76.5%). Distal AVF creation correlated with higher primary failure risk (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the primary failure rate and the presence of central venous catheter or serum results. In a sub analysis, we found that patients with central venous catheter had higher levels of inflammatory markers.
Our study highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation, ultrasound mapping, and careful AVF site selection. Recognizing vein and artery diameter thresholds for optimal outcomes is crucial. Avoiding central venous catheters in suitable patients can positively impact AVF results.
尽管术前进行了超声定位,但动静脉内瘘(AVF)成熟失败仍然很常见。识别预测性生物标志物有助于预测原发性失败并减少侵入性操作。我们的研究旨在确定原发性AVF失败或延迟的临床和分析风险因素。
一项前瞻性研究(2022年10月至2023年3月)纳入了计划进行AVF创建的成年患者。所有患者均进行了术前超声定位,并在术后至少6周评估AVF成熟情况。收集了临床、分析和人口统计学数据。
纳入80例患者,男性占62.5%,平均年龄66.3岁。对于远端吻合,术前静脉直径(3.8±1.2 vs. 2.8±0.6 mm;p = 0.002)和供血动脉直径(2.5±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.3 mm;p = 0.001)是影响原发性失败的重要因素。此外,对于近端吻合,动脉直径(2.4±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.4 mm;p = 0.01)对AVF成熟有影响。为远端AVF建立的ROC曲线显示静脉直径截断值为3.25 mm(AUC = 77.2%),动脉截断值为2.35 mm(AUC = 74.6%);为近端AVF建立的ROC曲线显示动脉截断值为2.25 mm(AUC = 76.5%)。创建远端AVF与更高的原发性失败风险相关(p < 0.001)。未发现原发性失败率与中心静脉导管的存在或血清结果之间存在相关性。在亚组分析中,我们发现有中心静脉导管的患者炎症标志物水平较高。
我们的研究强调了术前评估、超声定位和仔细选择AVF部位的重要性。认识到最佳结果的静脉和动脉直径阈值至关重要。在合适的患者中避免使用中心静脉导管可对AVF结果产生积极影响。