Suppr超能文献

安大略省呼吸道病毒感染患者合并细菌感染的患病率及预测因素:一项队列研究

Prevalence and Predictors of Concomitant Bacterial Infections in Patients With Respiratory Viruses in Ontario: A Cohort Study.

作者信息

Wang Yue, Swayze Sarah, Brown Kevin A, MacFadden Derek R, Lee Samantha M, Schwartz Kevin L, Daneman Nick, Langford Bradley J

机构信息

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 3;11(12):ofae701. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae701. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the prevalence of concomitant bacterial infection across common viral infections.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included patients infected with influenza A and B (FLUA, FLUB) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ontario between 2017 and 2019 and patients with SARS-CoV-2 between 2020 and 2021. Specific bacteria present in concomitant infections were identified. Concomitant infections were further classified into different categories (eg, coinfection -2 to +2 days from viral infection and secondary infection >2 days after viral infection). We used logistic regression models to estimate the odds of bacterial infections for FLUA, FLUB, and RSV relative to SARS-CoV-2 while adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 4230 (0.5%, 885 004) viral cases had concomitant bacterial infections, encompassing 422 of FLUB (4.7%, 8891), 861 of FLUA (3.9%, 22 313), 428 of RSV (3.4%, 12 774), and 2519 of COVID-19 (0.3%, 841 026). The most prevalent species causing concomitant bacterial infection were , , and . When compared with SARS-CoV-2, the adjusted odds ratio for bacterial infection was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.48-1.93) for FLUA, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.97-2.69) for FLUB, and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.33-1.82) for RSV. The adjusted odds of coinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2 were lower but higher for secondary infection as compared with the other viruses.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher prevalence and risk of concomitant bacterial infection were found in FLUA, FLUB, and RSV as compared with SARS-CoV-2, although this is largely driven by coinfections. Ongoing surveillance efforts are needed to compare the risk of concomitant infections during periods when these viruses are cocirculating.

摘要

背景

调查常见病毒感染中合并细菌感染的患病率。

方法

这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了2017年至2019年安大略省感染甲型和乙型流感(FLUA、FLUB)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的患者以及2020年至2021年感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的患者。确定合并感染中存在的特定细菌。合并感染进一步分为不同类别(例如,病毒感染后-2至+2天的混合感染以及病毒感染后>2天的继发感染)。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计FLUA、FLUB和RSV相对于SARS-CoV-2发生细菌感染的几率,同时对混杂因素进行调整。

结果

共有4230例(0.5%,885004例)病毒感染病例合并细菌感染,其中包括422例FLUB(4.7%,8891例)、861例FLUA(3.9%,22313例)、428例RSV(3.4%,12774例)和2519例新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19,0.3%,841026例)。引起合并细菌感染最常见的菌种是 、 和 。与SARS-CoV-2相比,FLUA发生细菌感染的调整比值比为1.69(95%置信区间,1.48-1.93),FLUB为2.30(95%置信区间,1.97-2.69),RSV为1.56(95%置信区间,1.33-1.82)。与其他病毒相比,SARS-CoV-2患者发生混合感染的调整几率较低,但继发感染的几率较高。

结论

与SARS-CoV-2相比,FLUA、FLUB和RSV中合并细菌感染的患病率和风险更高,尽管这在很大程度上是由混合感染导致的。需要持续进行监测,以比较这些病毒共同流行期间合并感染的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5455/11651150/f51637d6cc00/ofae701f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验