• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概念混淆:养老院多专业参与预先护理计划的障碍——一项人种志研究

Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes - An Ethnographic Study.

作者信息

Andrews Nicola, Myall Michelle

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):225-232. doi: 10.1177/08258597241305846. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1177/08258597241305846
PMID:39692346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12130609/
Abstract

ObjectivesHow health and social care professionals need to work together to deliver advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes is not fully understood, with a reliance on professionals external to the nursing home to support ACP in the United Kingdom. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine the factors that influence multi-professional involvement in the ACP process within nursing homes and (b) explore how multi-professional working impacts the ACP process in nursing homes.MethodsUsing ethnography, data was collected through observation, interviews and document review from 36 participants including residents ( = 6), relatives ( = 4), nursing home staff ( = 19) and visiting professionals ( = 7). Data analysis combined thematic analysis, mapping of ACP trajectories for participant residents, and documentary analysis of nursing home policies.ResultsThere was conceptual confusion around ACP. How ACP was understood and what was prioritised for inclusion varied between residents and professionals, and between different professionals. That ACP was frequently integrated with routine care planning was not recognised in how professionals accounted for their ACP practice. Professionals prioritised biomedical concerns, despite this not reflecting resident priorities and policy suggesting a broader definition. This created difficulties in enacting ACP, with a holistic understanding of resident wishes not always captured.ConclusionsA shared understanding of ACP was not consistently evident from those tasked with its enactment. This, combined with professional construction of ACP in biomedical terms, limits multi-professional working and can prevent a person-centred process being achieved for nursing home residents.

摘要

目标

在英国,健康和社会护理专业人员如何协同工作以在养老院开展预先护理计划(ACP)尚未得到充分理解,目前依赖养老院外部的专业人员来支持 ACP。本研究的目标是:(a)考察影响养老院 ACP 过程中多专业参与的因素;(b)探究多专业协作如何影响养老院的 ACP 过程。

方法

采用人种志方法,通过观察、访谈和文件审查,从 36 名参与者收集数据,这些参与者包括居民(n = 6)、亲属(n = 4)、养老院工作人员(n = 19)和来访专业人员(n = 7)。数据分析结合了主题分析、为参与研究的居民绘制 ACP 轨迹图以及对养老院政策的文件分析。

结果

围绕 ACP 存在概念上的混淆。居民和专业人员之间以及不同专业人员之间,对 ACP 的理解以及纳入优先事项的内容各不相同。专业人员在解释其 ACP 实践时,并未认识到 ACP 经常与常规护理计划相结合。尽管这并不反映居民的优先事项且政策建议采用更宽泛的定义,但专业人员仍将生物医学问题作为优先事项。这给实施 ACP 带来了困难,对居民意愿的全面理解并非总能实现。

结论

负责实施 ACP 的人员之间,对 ACP 的共同理解并非始终清晰可见。这一点,再加上从生物医学角度对 ACP 的专业构建,限制了多专业协作,并可能妨碍为养老院居民实现以个人为中心的过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/12130609/18cf5eda7e6d/10.1177_08258597241305846-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/12130609/18cf5eda7e6d/10.1177_08258597241305846-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0026/12130609/18cf5eda7e6d/10.1177_08258597241305846-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes - An Ethnographic Study.概念混淆:养老院多专业参与预先护理计划的障碍——一项人种志研究
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):225-232. doi: 10.1177/08258597241305846. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
'I don't think they really link together, do they?' An ethnography of multi-professional involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.“我不认为它们真的有联系,不是吗?”养老院多专业参与预先医疗照护计划的民族志研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Dec 1;52(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad234.
3
Advance care planning in Norwegian nursing homes - limited awareness of the residents' preferences and values? A qualitative study.挪威养老院的预先护理计划——居民的偏好和价值观意识有限?一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1378-6.
4
'We have no crystal ball' - advance care planning at nursing homes from the perspective of nurses and physicians.'我们没有水晶球' - 从护士和医生的角度看养老院的预先护理计划。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):191-199. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608068. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
Advance care planning for nursing home residents with dementia: policy vs. practice.为患有痴呆症的养老院居民制定预先护理计划:政策与实践
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Mar;72(3):569-81. doi: 10.1111/jan.12854. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
6
How to achieve the desired outcomes of advance care planning in nursing homes: a theory of change.如何在养老院实现预先护理计划的预期结果:一个变革理论。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Feb 14;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0723-5.
7
"I just think that we should be informed" a qualitative study of family involvement in advance care planning in nursing homes.“我只是认为我们应该被告知”:一项关于养老院中家庭参与预先护理计划的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 10;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0156-7.
8
Perspectives of Nursing Home Staff in Advance Care Planning Conversations: Experiences from the APPROACHES Project.养老院员工在预先医疗照护计划对话中的观点:来自 APPROACHES 项目的经验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Nov;25(11):105265. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105265. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
9
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
10
"Research happens a lot in other settings-so why not here?" A qualitative interview study of stakeholders' views about advance planning for care home residents' research participation.“在其他环境中进行了很多研究——为什么这里不行?”一项关于利益攸关方对养老院居民参与研究的预先计划看法的定性访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2024 Oct 1;53(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae235.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdisciplinary staff perceptions of advance care planning in long-term care homes: a qualitative study.跨学科工作人员对长期护理院中的预先医疗指示的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 15;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01014-2.
2
A critical exploration of professional jurisdictions and role boundaries in inter-professional end-of-life care in the community.对社区跨专业临终关怀中专业管辖权和角色界限的批判性探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113300. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113300. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Implementing advance care planning with community-dwelling frail elders requires a system-wide approach: An integrative review applying a behaviour change model.
实施社区居住的体弱老年人的预先护理计划需要系统的方法:应用行为改变模型的综合审查。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;33(7):743-756. doi: 10.1177/0269216319845804. Epub 2019 May 6.
4
Social and structural conditions for the avoidance of advance care planning in neuro-oncology: a qualitative study.神经肿瘤学中避免预先护理计划的社会和结构条件:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):e019057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019057.
5
A Contemporary Paradigm: Integrating Spirituality in Advance Care Planning.一种当代范式:将精神层面融入临终关怀计划。
J Relig Health. 2018 Apr;57(2):662-671. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0541-7.
6
Religious leaders' perceptions of advance care planning: a secondary analysis of interviews with Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Islamic, Jewish, Sikh and Bahá'í leaders.宗教领袖对预先医疗护理计划的看法:对与佛教、基督教、印度教、伊斯兰教、犹太教、锡克教和巴哈伊教领袖的访谈进行二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0239-3.
7
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
8
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Barriers to advance care planning at the end of life: an explanatory systematic review of implementation studies.临终时预先护理计划的障碍:实施研究的解释性系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116629. eCollection 2015.
10
A qualitative study exploring use of the surprise question in the care of older people: perceptions of general practitioners and challenges for practice.一项探索在老年人护理中使用意外问题的定性研究:全科医生的看法及实践挑战
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar;7(1):32-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000679. Epub 2014 Aug 28.