Andrews Nicola, Myall Michelle
School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):225-232. doi: 10.1177/08258597241305846. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
ObjectivesHow health and social care professionals need to work together to deliver advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes is not fully understood, with a reliance on professionals external to the nursing home to support ACP in the United Kingdom. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine the factors that influence multi-professional involvement in the ACP process within nursing homes and (b) explore how multi-professional working impacts the ACP process in nursing homes.MethodsUsing ethnography, data was collected through observation, interviews and document review from 36 participants including residents ( = 6), relatives ( = 4), nursing home staff ( = 19) and visiting professionals ( = 7). Data analysis combined thematic analysis, mapping of ACP trajectories for participant residents, and documentary analysis of nursing home policies.ResultsThere was conceptual confusion around ACP. How ACP was understood and what was prioritised for inclusion varied between residents and professionals, and between different professionals. That ACP was frequently integrated with routine care planning was not recognised in how professionals accounted for their ACP practice. Professionals prioritised biomedical concerns, despite this not reflecting resident priorities and policy suggesting a broader definition. This created difficulties in enacting ACP, with a holistic understanding of resident wishes not always captured.ConclusionsA shared understanding of ACP was not consistently evident from those tasked with its enactment. This, combined with professional construction of ACP in biomedical terms, limits multi-professional working and can prevent a person-centred process being achieved for nursing home residents.
目标
在英国,健康和社会护理专业人员如何协同工作以在养老院开展预先护理计划(ACP)尚未得到充分理解,目前依赖养老院外部的专业人员来支持 ACP。本研究的目标是:(a)考察影响养老院 ACP 过程中多专业参与的因素;(b)探究多专业协作如何影响养老院的 ACP 过程。
方法
采用人种志方法,通过观察、访谈和文件审查,从 36 名参与者收集数据,这些参与者包括居民(n = 6)、亲属(n = 4)、养老院工作人员(n = 19)和来访专业人员(n = 7)。数据分析结合了主题分析、为参与研究的居民绘制 ACP 轨迹图以及对养老院政策的文件分析。
结果
围绕 ACP 存在概念上的混淆。居民和专业人员之间以及不同专业人员之间,对 ACP 的理解以及纳入优先事项的内容各不相同。专业人员在解释其 ACP 实践时,并未认识到 ACP 经常与常规护理计划相结合。尽管这并不反映居民的优先事项且政策建议采用更宽泛的定义,但专业人员仍将生物医学问题作为优先事项。这给实施 ACP 带来了困难,对居民意愿的全面理解并非总能实现。
结论
负责实施 ACP 的人员之间,对 ACP 的共同理解并非始终清晰可见。这一点,再加上从生物医学角度对 ACP 的专业构建,限制了多专业协作,并可能妨碍为养老院居民实现以个人为中心的过程。