Ayed Abdullah, Kallidonis Panagiotis, Tatanis Vasileios, Peteinaris Angelis, Liatsikos Evangelos, Natchagande Gilles
Department of Surgery, University of Bisha.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Patras.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 Nov 11;96(4):12990. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12990.
Despite the increasing trend of utilizing robotic techniques in pyeloplasty, little is known about the learning curve for robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) amongst urologists with no prior robotic experience. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of residents in the last year or recently appointed urologists performing RAP using an ex-vivo model.
A prospective ex-vivo model study was conducted including participants who were either residents in the last year or recently appointed urologists. All participants had obtained the E-BLUS certification, or they were able to complete its 4 tasks successfully in a dry lab, without prior robotic experience. Each participant performed four consecutive RAPs using the avatera system on an ex-vivo porcine model. The primary endpoint of the present study was the change in the average time to complete the anastomosis from the first to the fourth attempt.
Nine urologists and 8 residents were enrolled in this study. Each surgeon demonstrated a reduction in the time to complete anastomosis from the 1st to 4th attempt with an average of value of 4.41 ± 1.06 minutes (p = 0.003). The decrease in time was statistically significant in both urologists and residents subgroups (4.5 ± 1.41 minutes p = 0.049 and 4.33 ± 0.71 minutes p = 0.035 respectively).
The training on the ex-vivo model could lead, in only a few attempts, to a significant improvement in skills and in the required time of experienced-naïve surgeons to complete an RAP.
尽管在肾盂成形术中使用机器人技术的趋势日益增加,但对于没有机器人手术经验的泌尿外科医生而言,机器人辅助肾盂成形术(RAP)的学习曲线仍知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在使用体外模型评估最后一年的住院医师或最近任命的泌尿外科医生进行RAP的学习曲线。
进行了一项前瞻性体外模型研究,参与者为最后一年的住院医师或最近任命的泌尿外科医生。所有参与者均获得了电子膀胱镜超声(E-BLUS)认证,或者他们能够在模拟实验室中成功完成其4项任务,且无机器人手术经验。每位参与者在体外猪模型上使用阿瓦特拉系统连续进行4次RAP。本研究的主要终点是从第一次尝试到第四次尝试完成吻合术的平均时间变化。
本研究共纳入9名泌尿外科医生和8名住院医师。每位外科医生从第1次尝试到第4次尝试完成吻合术的时间均有所减少,平均值为4.41±1.06分钟(p = 0.003)。泌尿外科医生和住院医师亚组的时间减少均具有统计学意义(分别为4.5±1.41分钟,p = 0.049和4.33±0.71分钟,p = 0.035)。
在体外模型上进行训练,只需几次尝试,就能使经验不足的外科医生在技能和完成RAP所需时间方面得到显著改善。