Karimli Leyla, Ismayilova Leyla, Wells Christine R
Social Welfare Department, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.
Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Mar;76(3):415-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.10.030. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
The study applies the Family Stress Model to examine the impact of an integrated intervention on the mental health of children facing chronic adversity in Burkina Faso. Its primary goal is to enhance understanding of individual and relational factors at the family level as mediators and specific mechanisms through which poverty reduction can impact child well-being.
Cross-lagged autoregressive longitudinal mediation analyses tested the intervention effect on child mental health, examining maternal depression, maternal anxiety, harsh parenting, and child exposure to abuse as potential mediators. Longitudinal data were collected over the course of 24 months in a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted among 360 dyads (children aged 10-15 and their female caregivers) in Burkina Faso. Participants were randomized into a control arm, economic intervention using the Graduation approach (Treatment Arm 1), or a combination of economic strengthening and family coaching (Treatment Arm 2).
In Treatment Arm 1, maternal depression fully mediated the intervention effect on child's depression (B = -0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] from -0.26 to -0.003) and child's self-esteem (B = 0.05, 95% CI from 0.001-0.18). In Treatment Arm 2, violent parenting practices partially mediated the intervention effect on child's depression (B = -0.08, 95% CI from -0.29 to -0.01).
Our study underscores the importance of multifaceted interventions merging economic empowerment with family-focused child protection strategies. This approach fosters a supportive family environment, reducing children's vulnerability to mental health issues in resource-poor communities. It enriches our understanding of how parental economic and behavioral interventions impact child mental health outcomes.
本研究应用家庭压力模型,考察一项综合干预措施对布基纳法索面临长期逆境儿童心理健康的影响。其主要目标是增进对家庭层面个体和关系因素作为中介以及减贫影响儿童福祉的具体机制的理解。
交叉滞后自回归纵向中介分析检验了干预对儿童心理健康的影响,考察了母亲抑郁、母亲焦虑、严厉育儿以及儿童遭受虐待作为潜在中介因素。在布基纳法索对360对二元组(10 - 15岁儿童及其女性照料者)进行的整群随机对照试验中,在24个月的时间里收集纵向数据。参与者被随机分为对照组、采用“毕业”方法的经济干预组(治疗组1)或经济强化与家庭辅导相结合的组(治疗组2)。
在治疗组1中,母亲抑郁完全中介了干预对儿童抑郁(B = -0.09,95%置信区间[CI]为-0.26至-0.003)和儿童自尊(B = 0.05,95%CI为0.001 - 0.18)的影响。在治疗组2中,暴力育儿行为部分中介了干预对儿童抑郁的影响(B = -0.08,95%CI为-0.29至-0.01)。
我们研究强调了将经济赋权与以家庭为重点的儿童保护策略相结合的多方面干预措施的重要性。这种方法营造了一个支持性的家庭环境,降低了资源匮乏社区儿童出现心理健康问题的易感性。它丰富了我们对父母经济和行为干预如何影响儿童心理健康结果的理解。