• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习驱动的青少年轻躁狂检查表-32简化:一种特征选择方法。

Machine learning-driven simplification of the hypomania checklist-32 for adolescent: a feature selection approach.

作者信息

Shen Guanghui, Chen Haoran, Ye Xinwu, Xue Xiaodong, Tang Shusi

机构信息

Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.

Cangnan County People's Hospital, Wenzhou, 325800, China.

出版信息

Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024 Dec 18;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00365-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40345-024-00365-4
PMID:39692968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Hypomania Checklist-32 is widely used to screen for bipolar disorder, but its length can be challenging for adolescents with manic symptoms. This study aimed to develop a shortened version of the HCL-32 tailored for adolescents using machine learning techniques.

METHODS

Data from 2,850 adolescents (mean age 15.50 years, 68.81% female) who completed the HCL-32 were analyzed. Random forest (RF) and gradient boosting machine (GBM) algorithms were employed for feature selection. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine optimal cutoff points for the shortened scale.

RESULTS

An 8-item version of the HCL-32 was derived, maintaining high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.97). The selected items captured core symptoms of adolescent mania, including increased energy, risk-taking, and irritability. Two cutoff points were identified: a score of 3 offered high specificity (0.98) and positive predictive value (0.98), while a score of 4 provided balanced sensitivity (0.87) and specificity (0.94) with the highest overall accuracy (0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning-driven 8-item version of the HCL-32 demonstrates strong diagnostic utility for adolescent bipolar disorder, offering a more efficient screening tool without sacrificing clinical sensitivity. This shortened scale may improve assessment feasibility and accuracy in clinical settings, addressing the unique challenges of diagnosing bipolar disorder in adolescents.

摘要

背景

轻躁狂检查表-32(Hypomania Checklist-32,HCL-32)被广泛用于筛查双相情感障碍,但对于有躁狂症状的青少年来说,其篇幅可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在使用机器学习技术开发一个专为青少年量身定制的HCL-32简版。

方法

对2850名完成HCL-32的青少年(平均年龄15.50岁,68.81%为女性)的数据进行分析。采用随机森林(RF)和梯度提升机(GBM)算法进行特征选择。曲线下面积(AUC)用于评估模型性能。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以确定简版量表的最佳截断点。

结果

得出了一个8项版本的HCL-32,保持了较高的预测准确性(AUC = 0.97)。所选项目涵盖了青少年躁狂的核心症状,包括精力增加、冒险行为和易怒。确定了两个截断点:3分具有较高的特异性(0.98)和阳性预测值(0.98),而4分提供了平衡的敏感性(0.87)和特异性(0.94),总体准确性最高(0.91)。

结论

机器学习驱动的8项版本的HCL-32对青少年双相情感障碍具有很强的诊断效用,提供了一种更有效的筛查工具,同时不牺牲临床敏感性。这个简版量表可能会提高临床环境中的评估可行性和准确性,解决青少年双相情感障碍诊断中的独特挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/6ceef841f102/40345_2024_365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/f41ffe6d3f93/40345_2024_365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/343b80a20f84/40345_2024_365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/2160ed04863a/40345_2024_365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/6ceef841f102/40345_2024_365_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/f41ffe6d3f93/40345_2024_365_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/343b80a20f84/40345_2024_365_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/2160ed04863a/40345_2024_365_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f612/11655905/6ceef841f102/40345_2024_365_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning-driven simplification of the hypomania checklist-32 for adolescent: a feature selection approach.机器学习驱动的青少年轻躁狂检查表-32简化:一种特征选择方法。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024 Dec 18;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00365-4.
2
Machine learning-driven development of a stratified CES-D screening system: optimizing depression assessment through adaptive item selection.基于机器学习的分层CES-D筛查系统的开发:通过自适应项目选择优化抑郁症评估
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06693-8.
3
A comparison of the 33-item Hypomania Checklist with the 33-item Hypomania Checklist-external assessment for the detection of bipolar disorder in adolescents.将33项轻躁狂检查表与33项轻躁狂检查表外部评估用于检测青少年双相情感障碍的比较。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Dec 18;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00246-0.
4
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
5
Reducing the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) to a 16-item version.简化躁狂清单(HCL-32)为 16 项版本。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Aug;124(3):351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
6
Investigation of the clinical utility of the hypomania checklist 32 (HCL-32) for the screening of bipolar disorders in the non-clinical adult population.评估轻躁狂检查表32(HCL-32)在非临床成年人群中筛查双相情感障碍的临床效用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 4;16:124. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0831-8.
7
Comparison of the 32-item Hypomania Checklist, the 33-item Hypomania Checklist, and the Mood Disorders Questionnaire for bipolar disorder.双相障碍 32 项轻躁狂清单、33 项轻躁狂清单和心境障碍问卷的比较。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jun;71(6):403-408. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12506. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
8
Validation of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist-External Assessment in Screening Adolescents for Bipolar Disorder.用于筛查青少年双相情感障碍的33项轻躁狂检查表-外部评估的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 15;13:897357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.897357. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparing Screening Abilities of the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) and the 33-Item Hypomania Checklist External Assessment (HCL-33-EA) for the Detection of Bipolar Disorder.比较33项轻躁狂检查表(HCL-33)和33项轻躁狂检查表外部评估(HCL-33-EA)对双相情感障碍的筛查能力。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 22;12:518722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.518722. eCollection 2021.
10
Validation of the 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) in screening adolescents with bipolar disorder.33 项轻躁狂清单(HCL-33)在筛查双相障碍青少年中的验证。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:786-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.062. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-driven development of a stratified CES-D screening system: optimizing depression assessment through adaptive item selection.基于机器学习的分层CES-D筛查系统的开发:通过自适应项目选择优化抑郁症评估
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06693-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Differentiation and comorbidity of bipolar disorder and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: A clinical and nosological perspective.儿童、青少年及成人双相情感障碍与注意力缺陷多动障碍的鉴别及共病:临床与疾病分类学视角
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 11;13:949375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.949375. eCollection 2022.
2
Personality traits influence the effectiveness of hypomania checklist-32 in screening for bipolar disorder.人格特质会影响轻躁狂检查表-32在双相情感障碍筛查中的有效性。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 15;13:919305. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.919305. eCollection 2022.
3
Feature Importance in Gradient Boosting Trees with Cross-Validation Feature Selection.
基于交叉验证特征选择的梯度提升树中的特征重要性
Entropy (Basel). 2022 May 13;24(5):687. doi: 10.3390/e24050687.
4
Development and validation of a gradient boosting machine to predict prognosis after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.开发和验证一种梯度提升机模型,用于预测肝内胆管细胞癌肝切除术后的预后。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 11;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09352-3.
5
Examining the utility of nonlinear machine learning approaches versus linear regression for predicting body image outcomes: The U.S. Body Project I.考察非线性机器学习方法与线性回归在预测身体意象结果方面的效用:美国身体项目 I。
Body Image. 2022 Jun;41:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
6
Multimetric feature selection for analyzing multicategory outcomes of colorectal cancer: random forest and multinomial logistic regression models.多指标特征选择分析结直肠癌的多类别结局:随机森林和多项逻辑回归模型。
Lab Invest. 2022 Mar;102(3):236-244. doi: 10.1038/s41374-021-00662-x. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
7
Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in people with mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心境障碍患者注意缺陷多动障碍的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 May;143(5):380-391. doi: 10.1111/acps.13283. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
'Paediatric bipolar disorder' rates are lower than claimed - a reexamination of the epidemiological surveys used by a meta-analysis.“儿童双相情感障碍”发病率低于宣称值——对一项荟萃分析所采用的流行病学调查的重新审视
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018 Feb;23(1):14-22. doi: 10.1111/camh.12231. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
9
Machine Learning and Psychological Research: The Unexplored Effect of Measurement.机器学习与心理研究:测量的未知效应
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):809-816. doi: 10.1177/1745691620902467. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
Pre-pubertal bipolar disorder: origins and current status of the controversy.青春期前双相情感障碍:争议的起源与现状
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 Apr 20;8(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00185-2.