Campbell Kody R, Antonellis Prokopios, Peterka Robert J, Wilhelm Jennifer L, Scanlan Kathleen T, Pettigrew Natalie C, Chen Siting, Parrington Lucy, Fino Peter C, Chesnutt James C, Horak Fay B, Hullar Timothy E, King Laurie A
Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Injury Surveillance Program, Datalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Phys Ther. 2025 Feb 6;105(2). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae180.
There is unclear evidence on when to initiate physical therapy after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a non-athlete, adult population.
The objective of this study was to investigate physical therapy timing after mTBI through changes in patient-reported and clinically-assessed tools and objective and mechanism measurements of sensorimotor balance control.
This study was an investigator-blinded randomized control trial (NCT03479541).
The study took place at an academic research center.
Two hundred and three participants were randomized to earlier physical therapy (n = 82) or to later physical therapy (n = 121).
After enrollment, the earlier physical therapy group started rehabilitation within 1 week and the later group started rehabilitation after a 6-week wait period. All participants received similar rehabilitation; 6-week program administered and progressed by licensed physical therapists.
The primary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Secondary outcomes included common patient-reported/clinical assessments of mTBI and objective/mechanism measurements of balance, including novel measures of central sensorimotor integration. Differences between and within the groups on outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effect models, t tests, and effect sizes.
While both groups significantly improved and reached similar levels on patient-reported outcomes (DHI and secondary outcomes), the earlier physical therapy group had significantly larger and faster rates of improvement compared to later physical therapy. There were differential effects of physical therapy timing on the objective/mechanism-measured outcomes. Specifically, there were significant improvements in sensorimotor time delay for the earlier physical therapy group and no change in the later group. Further, the later group worsened in the motor activation components for balance control while there was no change in the early group.
Earlier physical therapy after mTBI can improve symptoms at a faster rate relative to later physical therapy. Earlier physical therapy also showed improvements in sensorimotor aspects of balance control, not seen in the later group. There may be an important window to address central sensorimotor deficits after mTBI.
关于非运动员成年人群轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后何时开始物理治疗,证据尚不明确。
本研究的目的是通过患者报告和临床评估工具的变化以及感觉运动平衡控制的客观和机制测量,调查mTBI后的物理治疗时机。
本研究是一项研究者设盲的随机对照试验(NCT03479541)。
研究在一个学术研究中心进行。
203名参与者被随机分为早期物理治疗组(n = 82)或晚期物理治疗组(n = 121)。
入组后,早期物理治疗组在1周内开始康复治疗,晚期组在等待6周后开始康复治疗。所有参与者接受相似的康复治疗;由有执照的物理治疗师实施并推进为期6周的项目。
主要结局是头晕残障量表(DHI)。次要结局包括mTBI常见的患者报告/临床评估以及平衡的客观/机制测量,包括中枢感觉运动整合的新测量指标。使用线性混合效应模型、t检验和效应量来检查组间和组内结局的差异。
虽然两组在患者报告的结局(DHI和次要结局)上均有显著改善且达到相似水平,但早期物理治疗组与晚期物理治疗组相比,改善幅度更大且速度更快。物理治疗时机对客观/机制测量的结局有不同影响。具体而言,早期物理治疗组的感觉运动时间延迟有显著改善,而晚期组没有变化。此外,晚期组在平衡控制的运动激活成分方面恶化,而早期组没有变化。
与晚期物理治疗相比,mTBI后早期物理治疗能更快改善症状。早期物理治疗在平衡控制的感觉运动方面也有改善,晚期组未观察到。mTBI后解决中枢感觉运动缺陷可能存在一个重要窗口期。