Jackisch Josephine, van Raalte Alyson
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; Max Planck - University of Helsinki Center for Social Inequalities in Population Health (MaxHel Center), Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; Max Planck - University of Helsinki Center for Social Inequalities in Population Health (MaxHel Center), Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Jan;365:117627. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117627. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
"Child maltreatment is a leading cause of health inequality" according to a leading WHO report. This statement is often assumed, yet, the size of the contribution of childhood adversity to the adult socioeconomic gradient in mortality remains unknown. Inequalities in mortality have mostly been investigated by taking adult conditions as a starting point. The objective of this study is to quantify how much of the socioeconomic gradient in adult life expectancy is associated with childhood adversity.
Drawing on a 1953 birth cohort from Stockholm (n = 14 210), we compared inequalities in adult mortality within the full cohort to a counterfactual scenario where individuals with a history of childhood adversity (indicated by involvement with child welfare services) experienced the mortality rates of those achieving the same adult socioeconomic position, but with no history of childhood adversity. The socioeconomic gradient across education and income quintiles (attained by age 29) is measured by the slope index of inequality of temporary life expectancy (ages 29-67).
The counterfactual scenario attenuated the education gradient by 40 percent for men and 54 percent for women. Similarly, inequalities by income were reduced in the counterfactual scenario by 49 percent for men and 47 percent for women.
These results support that childhood adversity is an important determinant of inequalities in mortality. The size of their contribution is equivalent to established behavioural risk factors. Taking a life course approach might provide important policy entry points to mitigate health inequalities.
根据世界卫生组织的一份重要报告,“儿童虐待是健康不平等的主要原因”。这一说法常被人们所认同,然而,儿童时期的逆境对成年人死亡率社会经济梯度的影响程度仍不明确。死亡率不平等问题大多是从成年人的状况入手进行研究的。本研究的目的是量化成年预期寿命中的社会经济梯度与儿童时期逆境之间的关联程度。
利用来自斯德哥尔摩的一个1953年出生队列(n = 14210),我们将整个队列中成年人死亡率的不平等情况与一个反事实情景进行了比较。在该反事实情景中,有儿童时期逆境经历(通过儿童福利服务记录表明)的个体,若处于相同的成年社会经济地位,但无儿童时期逆境经历,那么他们的死亡率将与这些个体相同。通过临时预期寿命(29 - 67岁)不平等斜率指数来衡量教育程度和收入五分位数(29岁时达到)方面的社会经济梯度。
在反事实情景中,男性的教育梯度减弱了40%,女性减弱了54%。同样,男性的收入不平等在反事实情景中降低了49%,女性降低了47%。
这些结果表明儿童时期的逆境是死亡率不平等的一个重要决定因素。其影响程度等同于已确定的行为风险因素。采用生命历程方法可能为缓解健康不平等提供重要的政策切入点。